Commentary Magazine


Contentions

For Shame!

Parliaments the world over have attempted to emulate Westminster, the mother of modern Western democracy. Clearly, Westminster’s aura and glory have more to do with its enduring legacy as an institution than with the men and women who rotate in and out of its austere hall. Nevertheless, those men and women will, sooner or later, contribute to Westminster’s reputation. Indeed, a few weeks ago, when one of their committees released a report on the Middle East peace process, the Lords did their share to tarnish the credibility of their unelected house. Not to be outdone, the Commons have now produced their own report. A selection of its recommendations does little to honor its compilers.

On Iran: “[I]t is vital that the UK and the international community engage constructively and coherently with Iran.”

On Iraq: “[I]t is too early to provide a definitive assessment of the U.S. ‘surge’ but . . . it does not look likely to succeed.”

On the Muslim Brotherhood: “The Muslim Brotherhood is a powerful and important force in Egypt. As long as the Muslim Brotherhood expresses a commitment to the democratic process and non-violence, we recommend that the British Government should engage with it and seek to influence its members.”

On Syria: “Syria plays a significant role in most of the key areas in the Middle East and . . . this role may slowly be changing for the better . . . the European Union Association Agreement with Syria presents a powerful incentive for President Assad to remedy his country’s political behavior, particularly given Syria’s current efforts towards economic reform.”

On Lebanon and Hizballah: “Hizballah is undeniably an important element in Lebanon’s politics, although its influence, along with Iran’s and Syria’s, continues to be a malign one.” Therefore, “the Government should engage directly with moderate Hizballah Parliamentarians. The Government should continue to refuse to engage with the military wing of Hizballah.” [A largely specious distinction.]

A cursory glance at those providing evidence—Chatham House Arabists, Assad clan apologists, and other self-styled Middle East advisers—shows the overwhelming influence of people who have a proven record of NOT understanding the region, and of speaking on behalf of its worst elements. The 236-page report can be summed up as such: Betray your friends, appease your enemies, pay ransom, surrender, and, where possible and lucrative, collaborate. Not Westminster’s finest hour.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.