Commentary Magazine


Posts For: December 25, 2007

Christmas in Darfur

In a letter recently published in the British newspaper, The Mirror, England’s Prime Minister Gordon Brown wrote, “As we join our families for Christmas, we must not forget the mothers, fathers and children of Darfur.” He went on:

I am determined that Darfur’s tragedy should not continue. This determination is shared by the hundreds of humanitarian workers who continue to deliver aid to the people of the region in atrocious conditions, and the millions of campaigners throughout the world, including Mirror readers, who have kept Darfur on the world’s agenda.

Darfur is a test of whether the international community has the guts to stand up for its values.

If one takes an honest assessment of those values it seems the international community is passing the test with flying colors. Reviewing over four years of multilateralism on Darfur, one finds: a quarter-million corpses, two million people displaced, four million people on aid, incalculable billions in Chinese oil deals and investments, four toothless U.N. resolutions, and one earnest George Clooney documentary.

But no cowboy diplomacy, and that’s the important thing, after all. The endless Darfur horror is a perfect example of multilateralism for multilateralism’s sake. This article by Eric Reeves, re-printed in the Sudan Tribune, is a must-read primer on the ways in which China (using the U.N.) has endorsed and bankrolled a five-year massacre.

In his letter, Gordon Brown cites enthusiastically the deployment to Darfur of a large group of U.N. peace-keepers this coming January. With no peace to keep (and no orders to fight), the men in blue helmets will merely bear witness as all the figures mentioned above continue to climb.

In a letter recently published in the British newspaper, The Mirror, England’s Prime Minister Gordon Brown wrote, “As we join our families for Christmas, we must not forget the mothers, fathers and children of Darfur.” He went on:

I am determined that Darfur’s tragedy should not continue. This determination is shared by the hundreds of humanitarian workers who continue to deliver aid to the people of the region in atrocious conditions, and the millions of campaigners throughout the world, including Mirror readers, who have kept Darfur on the world’s agenda.

Darfur is a test of whether the international community has the guts to stand up for its values.

If one takes an honest assessment of those values it seems the international community is passing the test with flying colors. Reviewing over four years of multilateralism on Darfur, one finds: a quarter-million corpses, two million people displaced, four million people on aid, incalculable billions in Chinese oil deals and investments, four toothless U.N. resolutions, and one earnest George Clooney documentary.

But no cowboy diplomacy, and that’s the important thing, after all. The endless Darfur horror is a perfect example of multilateralism for multilateralism’s sake. This article by Eric Reeves, re-printed in the Sudan Tribune, is a must-read primer on the ways in which China (using the U.N.) has endorsed and bankrolled a five-year massacre.

In his letter, Gordon Brown cites enthusiastically the deployment to Darfur of a large group of U.N. peace-keepers this coming January. With no peace to keep (and no orders to fight), the men in blue helmets will merely bear witness as all the figures mentioned above continue to climb.

Read Less

Obama, the Non-Muslim

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama is a Christian.  As his official campaign biography notes, Obama worked as a community organizer in Chicago with a church-based group after graduating from Columbia, and he currently attends Trinity United Church of Christ with his family.

Yet at various points during his campaign, Obama has had to address questions regarding the Islamic aspects of his biography, which include a Kenyan-Muslim father, an Indonesian-Muslim stepfather, four years spent living in Indonesia during his childhood, and an Islamic middle name (Hussein).  Earlier this year, with the help of investigative journalists, Obama debunked the rumor that he had studied at an Indonesian madrassa.  Yesterday, amid whispers from supporters of Hillary Clinton, Obama again declared that stories regarding his “Muslim background” had been “misreported.”

These episodes questioning Obama’s “true faith” expose two disturbing trends.  The first is the upsetting tendency of Obama’s opponents to invoke his “Muslim roots” as a weapon.  Although this smear campaign is most pronounced on the Internet, it received a substantial bump last week, when former Nebraska Senator Bob Kerrey played the Muslim card while endorsing Hillary Clinton.  “I like the fact that his name is Barack Hussein Obama, and that his father was a Muslim and that his paternal grandmother is a Muslim,” Kerrey said.  News of Kerrey’s remark quickly spread to the Arabic press, where readers of the al-Arabiyya were outraged, commenting that the statements were “racist” and proved that “America is at war with Islam to build Zion.”  Their anger—though surely not their bigoted retorts—is understandable.  If it is wrong to take issue with Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith, then it is logically even more wrong to take issue with Obama’s non-Islamic faith, especially insofar as it demonizes Islam in the process.

But Obama’s responses to these spurious insinuations are also frustrating.  Obama likes to have it both ways, severely downplaying his Islamic heritage while still claiming to possess a unique understanding of the Muslim world.  In this vein, you won’t find “Hussein” anywhere in his officially produced campaign content, while he emphatically told an Iowa audience on Sunday that his Muslim father “wasn’t very religious.”  Yet, in the same conversation, Obama claimed that living in Indonesia from the ages of 6-10 gave him “insight into how these folks think.”  Where does this insight come from, if Obama is as removed from Islam as he claims?  What kind of intense sociocultural conversations was young Barry Obama having with his classmates during recess in Jakarta that would meaningfully inform his thinking on the Muslim world four decades later?

Frankly, Obama’s response demonstrates that his experience in the Muslim world has taught him little about “these folks.”  Indeed, if he truly understood the Muslim world, he would respond to future insinuations regarding his “Muslim background” by taking umbrage at the equation of Islam with evil, and declaring such sentiments un-American.  Perceptions of Islam are critical to many in the Muslim world, and statements such as those made by Kerrey do little to assuage their concerns.  Instead, Obama has fallen back on the selectively embellished version of his cultural biography, reminding us of his travels when he is unable to provide substance.

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama is a Christian.  As his official campaign biography notes, Obama worked as a community organizer in Chicago with a church-based group after graduating from Columbia, and he currently attends Trinity United Church of Christ with his family.

Yet at various points during his campaign, Obama has had to address questions regarding the Islamic aspects of his biography, which include a Kenyan-Muslim father, an Indonesian-Muslim stepfather, four years spent living in Indonesia during his childhood, and an Islamic middle name (Hussein).  Earlier this year, with the help of investigative journalists, Obama debunked the rumor that he had studied at an Indonesian madrassa.  Yesterday, amid whispers from supporters of Hillary Clinton, Obama again declared that stories regarding his “Muslim background” had been “misreported.”

These episodes questioning Obama’s “true faith” expose two disturbing trends.  The first is the upsetting tendency of Obama’s opponents to invoke his “Muslim roots” as a weapon.  Although this smear campaign is most pronounced on the Internet, it received a substantial bump last week, when former Nebraska Senator Bob Kerrey played the Muslim card while endorsing Hillary Clinton.  “I like the fact that his name is Barack Hussein Obama, and that his father was a Muslim and that his paternal grandmother is a Muslim,” Kerrey said.  News of Kerrey’s remark quickly spread to the Arabic press, where readers of the al-Arabiyya were outraged, commenting that the statements were “racist” and proved that “America is at war with Islam to build Zion.”  Their anger—though surely not their bigoted retorts—is understandable.  If it is wrong to take issue with Mitt Romney’s Mormon faith, then it is logically even more wrong to take issue with Obama’s non-Islamic faith, especially insofar as it demonizes Islam in the process.

But Obama’s responses to these spurious insinuations are also frustrating.  Obama likes to have it both ways, severely downplaying his Islamic heritage while still claiming to possess a unique understanding of the Muslim world.  In this vein, you won’t find “Hussein” anywhere in his officially produced campaign content, while he emphatically told an Iowa audience on Sunday that his Muslim father “wasn’t very religious.”  Yet, in the same conversation, Obama claimed that living in Indonesia from the ages of 6-10 gave him “insight into how these folks think.”  Where does this insight come from, if Obama is as removed from Islam as he claims?  What kind of intense sociocultural conversations was young Barry Obama having with his classmates during recess in Jakarta that would meaningfully inform his thinking on the Muslim world four decades later?

Frankly, Obama’s response demonstrates that his experience in the Muslim world has taught him little about “these folks.”  Indeed, if he truly understood the Muslim world, he would respond to future insinuations regarding his “Muslim background” by taking umbrage at the equation of Islam with evil, and declaring such sentiments un-American.  Perceptions of Islam are critical to many in the Muslim world, and statements such as those made by Kerrey do little to assuage their concerns.  Instead, Obama has fallen back on the selectively embellished version of his cultural biography, reminding us of his travels when he is unable to provide substance.

Read Less




Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.