There were two presidential debates tonight (Saturday, January 5) — one among the Democrats and one among the Republicans. Just look below this post for dozens of posts throughout the evening offering reactions and responses to the hijinks in New Hampshire. Good night.
Posts For: January 5, 2008
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Recession
Hillary Clinton’s introduction of the possibility of recession — the first time the word was used this evening — made her sound commanding. The weakness of the economy, I suspect, will be the most powerful theme in the race for the next month, precisely because no one really knows how things will pan out. Yet once again, this reminds us that failure is the Democratic strong suit. Clinton’s response to economic uncertainty is to talk about fuel efficiency and the under-taxed wealthy. There is a serious opportunity here for sunny, Reaganesque optimism here in response.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: My Nightmare
Hillary Clinton becomes president, and talks incessantly, as she just did, about “emergency weatherization” tax credits.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Hillary Against Lobbyists for Drug Companies?
Clinton likes to accuse her opponents of having staff members who are “lobbyists for the drug companies.” It’s a specious, meaningless charge. But shouldn’t someone point out that Mark Penn, chief Hillary strategist, is also CEO of Burson-Marsteller, the PR firm for Wyeth, Pfizer, Amgen and hundreds of other corporations? I don’t see anything wrong with Mark Penn’s career, but the depth of her phoniness is breathtaking.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Hillary’s Only Pitch
“Words are not action. And as beautifully presented and passionately felt as they are, they are not action.” This is the territory on which she must stake her ground — that she is actually more “authentic” than Obama because she is not as eloquent as he is, and because she is more of a doer than a talker.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Reviewing the First Half of the Democratic Debate
A reaction to the first half of the Democratic debate: What a shame that we have been denied a four-person stage for so many months. What a relief to be free of Kucinich, Gravel, Biden, et. al.
Clinton: Now with a loss under her belt, she appears to be trying harder — maybe too hard has the best arguments and facts, and the least amount of presidential personality. She is incapable of a presidential moment. (By the way, does anyone really believe she is ready to be president on Day One?)
Obama: He has the mannerism of a rock star with a number one hit. He refuses to be flustered, even when he doesn’t have anything to say.
Edwards: He is still trying to persuade the audience that greed is the problem. That theme has never really taken off this year, but he is still selling fear and anger to a Democratic crowd that has never been more optimistic.
Richardson: He keeps pushing his resume, which is remarkable. But he is so verbose and self-important that it strips him of any presidential aura. And boy, is he angling for a VP seat.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Democrats for Failure
When asked about whether the surge worked, the Democrats at tonight’s debate give us the best sense of why a Republican can win in November. They are all desperate to sell failure — only moments after an ABC report flatly said that the surge has succeeded to reduce violence in Iraq in a huge way. If, ten months from now, the election becomes a referendum about declaring defeat and going home or accepting signs of success and figuring out how to build on it, the success team will be in a much better place.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Bill Richardson Makes a Fool of Himself
Richardson gets laughs by throwing out his prefabricated line: “I’ve been involved in hostage negotiations more civil than this.” He shouldn’t have. This is an extraordinarily civil debate.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: John Edwards Implies He Is Being Oppressed…
…by the forces of the status quo. Because he wants change. Usually, oppressed people don’t have 28,000 square-foot mansions.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Is Obama A Flip-Flopper?
Hillary does a very, very good job of making the case that Obama doesn’t fulfill his campaign promises and changes his positions — without anger and without shrillness. Obama, in response, speaks eloquently and beautifully and says nothing to address the charge.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: John Edwards Wants the President to Be a Prozac Pill
John Edwards, asked about a nuclear bomb going off in an American city, says something inane and then something bizarre: “The first thing is, we have to find out who’s responsible and go after them.” Oh. “Secondly, it is the responsibility of the United States, of the president in times like this, to be a force for principled strength but also calmness…to do it in a way that is calming for the American people and calming for the world.” Yes. Because that’s what we’ll need after a nuclear attack. Calmness.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Hillary the Hawk, Kind Of
Hillary Clinton just said the United States did not “aggressively go after” Bin Laden in Afghanistan, and that we need to do so now. How should we do it? With “NATO troops.”
NEW HAMPSHIRE: A Strangely Touching Moment
ABC’s Charlie Gibson, who is moderating these back-to-back debates, asked at the conclusion of the Republican contest for the Democratic candidates to come out and shake hands with the Republicans. They had a civil minute of joshing and smiling. I don’t want to sound sappy, but there was something lovely about it.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Vertical Leadership
Mike Huckabee, speaking either some kind of Business Book argot unknown to me or inventing an entirely new system of political-science categorization, says Americans are tired of horizontal leadership and want vertical leadership. This might have worked as a double-entendre criticism of Bill Clinton, but it’s incomprehensible in this context.
NEW HAMPSHIRE: Perhaps Noticing That Romney Was Doing Well…
…the last third of the debate features a major gang-up on Romney, and he hasn’t handled it all that well.



