Haley Barbour, Governor of Mississippi and former GOP Chairman, in the nicest way possible said that Romney is having a bad night and soon it will be time to get behind the winner. Barbour said he could enthusiastically support any of the contenders, even if “none of them are as conservative as I am.”
Contentions
One Response to “That’s Why He Was GOP Chairman”
May 2013
-
Articles
-
"My Negro Problem-and Ours" at 50
Norman Podhoretz -
Gay Marriage, the Court, and Federalism
Tara Helfman -
The Spirit of '75?
Algis ValiunasAn audacious, and wrong, argument about the American Revolution.
-
In Praise of Sheryl Sandberg
Christine RosenThe controversial Facebook executive's book is exactly the right kind of self-help.
Fiction
-
Onto a Good Thing
Joseph Epstein
Politics & Ideas
-
The Bureaucrat-Driven Life
Heather Wilhelm -
The Making of an Education Reformer
Sohrab Ahmari -
Bork's Watergate
James Rosen -
Dear Prudence
Paul O. Carrese -
Whose Accomplishments?
Mona Charen
Culture & Civilization
-
The Parenting Trap
Dana Mack -
George Saunders, Anti-Minimalist
Fernanda Moore -
A Chekhov in Training
Terry Teachout -
What Ailes the Liberal Media?
Andrew Ferguson
John Podhoretz
-
Taking Obama's Foreign Policy Seriously
John Podhoretz
Threat Assessment
-
More Genocide Threats from Iran
Jonathan S. Tobin
Letters
-
Denying Jewish Peoplehood-and Reality
Our ReadersResponses to Robert S. Wistrich's "The Changing Face of Anti-Semitism"
-
Gun Laws, Crime, and Freedom
Our ReadersResponses to Benjamin Domenech's "The Truth About Mass Shootings and Gun Control"
-
Don't Confuse Principle and Pose
Our ReadersResponses to Matthew Continetti's "Poseur Politics in the Era of Obama"
-
Jews and Sports
Our Readers
Enter Laughing
-









Holder will be confirmed AG. All of Obama’s appointments will be confirmed. Some of the issues being brought to the floor are legit, others seem to be petty. Regardless, the public seems to be very uninterested – an apothetic condition that stems from election fatigue. For every concern raised about Obama’s appointments, similar issues surrounded all of Bush’s personnel at one time or another. As such, there will be a lot of noise on the blogosphere and some in the MSM – but all of this will amount to nothing.
Geithner needs to explain this one
Although I hear both Wesley Snipes and Richard Hatch give him a big thumbs up and booyah!
There is of course the law of unintended consequences. Blocking Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood as AGs for Clinton gave us the disasterous Janet “Let’s Burn the Compound to Save the Children” Reno and her assistant in failure Jamie “Let’s Build Some Walls” Gorelick (who inadvertently helped 9/11 happen and then was appointed to the 9/11 commission). That is like appointing Jack Ruby to the Warren Commission.
I agree Presidents need lee way in their appointments. But Holder needs to explain those questionable Clinton pardons and possible quid pro quo. And Geithner needs to answer to the Senate how he managed to miss paying $45,000 in taxes and did not face the full weight of the IRS falling on his head. Because if that were you or me, I doubt those tax officials would be so understanding.
#2 — “For every concern raised about Obama’s appointments, similar issues surrounded all of Bush’s personnel at one time or another.”
I would be curious to know when the issue of facilitating the sale of executive pardons ever surrounded any of Bush’s personnel.
I have just read that Orin Hatch is expected to cave on Holder. He is such a RINO – they will be the ruin of us!
#5 -
Point taken. I don’t really care to delve into the minutia of this stuff. I’m more than tired of all of the back-n-forth about who did this or that or when, etc… These confirmation hearings always amount to the same criticisms and scrutiny of past deeds by whoever is under review – with many of the standard partisan perspectives being criticized and defended. See – I’ve just said a bunch of nothing – just like much of what these confirmation hearings will ultimately produce – just a bunch of nothing to be hurled aroung by the MSM and blogosphere for the next few days, then all will be rapidly forgotten. That is basically how the public sees this stuff. Just standard political hay. My primary points regarding the confirmation process – regardless of how flawed some appointments may be to your partisan perspective – is that ALL of Obama’s appointments will be approved (including Holder for AG) and that the public at large just doesn’t care. Do you disagree?
It’s a testament to Obama’s unparalleled mastery of the transition game that a few confirmation speedbumps is all Commentary has to whine about.
Funny, I thought conservatives were supposed to be reinventing themselves for 2010? You sound like the same petty, partisan, small tent doofs who just got your backsides handed to you.
Both parties can boast many doofs. We may even find that our new maximum leader fails to meet minimum expectations.
#7 — As to the basic apathy of the public-at-large, yes I absolutely agree with you on that. As to the eventual confirmation of all of Obama’s nominees… I think that is a high probability, but not an absolute certainty. I think this Treasury-Sec nominee is in real trouble.
#10 -
Yeah, the treasury pick may have some issues. I still like him though. Perhaps enough will still confirm this guy. I’m not really a betting man, but my money is still riding on that this Treasury Secretary will be confirmed. There will of course be that lovable confirmation hearing that appears to be shaping up to be more colorful than the current AG prospect under scrutiny – but at the end of the day I think that Obama will get his man. Time will tell – and you just may prove me wrong. Anyway, cheers and have a nice day.
Sure, lets put a perjurer in charge of Justice and a tax cheat in charge of IRS! Hope n Change!
Obama may well be able to force these compromised candidates through a dem-dominated congress. But memories linger, and as the Chicago slime begins to ooze out from under the edges of the tent, folks will start to remember the character of the occupants inside. It is easy for new presidents to win victories during the honeymoon phase. But those with executive experience know to beware of “victories” that are inherently pyrrhic.
#12 — When/where/how did Eric Holder perjure himself?
Not trying to stir the pot, but I have honestly not heard that from any other source, so I am just wondering…