Says Obama. “We don’t believe in government doing for us what we can do for ourselves.” Then he says CEOs are paid too much and must be stopped. There’s been a lot of talk about the rhetorical strength of Obama’s speeches, how he uses classical tropes and incantatory repetition. To these we can also add: Non sequiturs.
Contentions
‘I Believe in the Free Market’
John Podhoretz
| @jpodhoretz
02.19.2008 - 10:01 PM
02.19.2008 - 10:01 PM
Topics: Barack Obama
2 Responses to “‘I Believe in the Free Market’”
June 2013
-
Articles
-
The Case for Drones
Kenneth AndersonThe United States can now wage war in a more nimble, low-risk, and humane fashion than ever before.
-
The ObamaCare Blame Game
Tevi Troy
Fiction
-
Past Due
Christine Sneed
Politics & Ideas
-
Gray Matter Chatter
Robert HerrittA review of Sally Satel and Scott O. Lilienfeld's Brainwashed
-
Vali of Doom
Sohrab Ahmari -
Beyond Good, Quite Evil
Andrew Roberts
Culture & Civilization
-
Exit Laughing
Rick Richman -
How Hitler Destroyed German Music
Terry Teachout -
Widow's Peak
Fernanda Moore -
Turncoat in a Toga
Stephen Daisley -
The Los Angeles Times Earthquake
Andrew Ferguson
John Podhoretz
-
The Second-Term Curse
John Podhoretz
Threat Assessment
-
Disappearing Red Lines
Jonathan S. Tobin
Letters
-
Republican Recovery
Our ReadersResponses to Michael Gerson and Peter Wehner's "How to Save the Republican Party"
Enter Laughing
-









The cycle of violence. The endless war. Disproportionate use of force.
All of these media slogans are only a blanket for the real source. Radical Islam. The promise of heaven through death will certainly justify the use of human shields. Its a concept so foreign to Westerners, that no one really believes that anyone lives by it.
Hamas really doesn’t care about the loss of civilians or even fighters. All of those people were given a great opportunity to die and go to Heaven. The real tactical strategy is to beam the pictures of the death and destruction around the world, to gain sympathy for war against Israel, and convince the international community to equate Israeli self-defense with genocide.
Israel must understand that Hamas wages a language war. The strategy is to flip the meaning of every word.
Cease fire = Hamas attacks Israel, Israel cannot respond
Holocaust = Jewish myth created by Israel to gain cover to commit genocide
civilian casualties = both soldiers and human shields combined. The side with the higher number is the moral winner
Each time there is a cease-fire, or more accurately, a hudna, Hamas will regroup to provoke the next attack, send out the pictures, and continue to change the way people look at Jews, Israel, and the laws of warfare and self-defense, until it fully lines up with their definitions and the jihadi outlook. After the military operation is over, Israel must devise a language/culture response-attack to stop this strategy.
BBC:
“Israeli ministers are set to vote on a unilateral ceasefire proposal at the weekend, Israeli officials say, amid signs of diplomatic movement on Gaza. ”
Did Israel reach a deal with Hamas? No. Egypt? Well, no. But is has won hard fought concessions with America, in which we pledge to help stop weapons shipments into Gaza. And isn’t that ultimately what you went to war for?
A lesson in dumb power. Will you learn from it? Nah.
“produced by the MEMRI ”
no thanks
So the least one understands spoken Arabic and reads written Arabic? Good for it.