Commentary Magazine


Contentions

First Mates

Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama seem to be in a contest over who can do the most damage to his or her spouse. Each reminds voters of the weaknesses of the respective candidates and gives their opponent’s supporters plenty of opportunities to say “Ah ha! See! Further evidence of . . .”

In the Clintons’ case, Bill is, of course, a walking, talking reminder that it is all about them. Their egos and their career ambitions take precedence over party and country. Self-discipline and restraint? Not from these two. And all those concerns about whether her experience is merely derivative are reignited every time voters hear the latest controversial or semi-controversial comment from him.

Michelle Obama has inadvertently emphasized the idea that she and her husband have lived a charmed and unappreciative life. They are “strapped,” but earn a six- or seven-figure income. Paying off college loans, which enabled them to go to an elite university and earn that massive income, is a burden almost too great to bear. Never feeling pride in a country in which she lived such a bountiful life suggests a lack of gratitude, if not of patriotism. We are left to wonder whether she, and in turn he, recognize the strengths and the greatness of the country he wants to lead.

One of the Democrats will win and face (with his/her spouse) the McCains. (In the category of little noticed advantages, McCain enjoys the support of an accomplished spouse who doesn’t do anything to embarrass him.) And while it may seem a trivial factor to consider, a spouse certainly can amplify or moderate a candidate’s shortcomings. Think Teresa Heinz Kerry– not exactly an asset for her husband as he tried to downplay his image as a Francophile snob.

The media, I have no doubt, will continue to obsess over whether gender, race or age matters more to voters. But a significant consideration–especially for those non-primary voting, apolitical “undecideds” we so feverishly study–may well be the person voters will have to imagine as First Spouse. After all, we’ll have to live with him or her for at least four years.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.