Commentary Magazine


Posts For: April 26, 2008

What’s Happening Here at Contentions

You may have had difficulty getting onto this page today, and you may again tonight. We’re “migrating” our files to a new server, and if you don’t know what that means, that’s completely fine — we don’t really know either. What we do know is that we’re doing this because we’ve had trouble over the past few months on days when the traffic has been very heavy, and we think this will solve the problem. So we thank you for your patience, and promise you a full complement of analysis and opinion when we’re back up and running.

You may have had difficulty getting onto this page today, and you may again tonight. We’re “migrating” our files to a new server, and if you don’t know what that means, that’s completely fine — we don’t really know either. What we do know is that we’re doing this because we’ve had trouble over the past few months on days when the traffic has been very heavy, and we think this will solve the problem. So we thank you for your patience, and promise you a full complement of analysis and opinion when we’re back up and running.

Read Less

Round Two On Hamas

Friday I questioned John McCain about Hamas’ endorsement of Barack Obama. His response (he’ll be Hamas’ “worst nightmare”) got the attention of the Obama camp. An Obama spokesman responded by chiding McCain for playing the “politics of association” and added this:

Senator Obama has repeatedly rejected and denounced the actions of Hamas, a terrorist organization responsible for the deaths of many innocents, that is dedicated to Israel’s destruction. As president, Obama will work with Israel to isolate terrorist groups like Hamas, target their resources, and support Israel’s right and capability to defend itself from any attack.

The McCain team would have none of it and shot back with this:

This is a legitimate issue for the American people to think about. The reason for Hamas’ praise of Senator Obama’s foreign policy is his commitment to meet unconditionally with Iran — a nation whose president denies the Holocaust, threatens to wipe Israel off the map, funds terrorists and sends weapons to Iraq to kill American soldiers. Senator Obama’s positions present a radical departure from the longstanding bipartisan consensus for isolating rogue regimes like Iran and North Korea. It is not only responsible to raise these critical issues in this election, but it would be the height of irresponsibility not to have this discussion with the American people.

Well, I suspect the McCain camp wouldn’t mind extending this debate for a while. So long as the issue is Obama’s popularity with terrorist groups and his willingness to personally court America’s enemies, McCain comes out ahead. And Hillary Clinton, who has been doing some favors for McCain lately (e.g. praising McCain’s commander-in-chief credentials) is probably delighted with this dialogue as well.

Friday I questioned John McCain about Hamas’ endorsement of Barack Obama. His response (he’ll be Hamas’ “worst nightmare”) got the attention of the Obama camp. An Obama spokesman responded by chiding McCain for playing the “politics of association” and added this:

Senator Obama has repeatedly rejected and denounced the actions of Hamas, a terrorist organization responsible for the deaths of many innocents, that is dedicated to Israel’s destruction. As president, Obama will work with Israel to isolate terrorist groups like Hamas, target their resources, and support Israel’s right and capability to defend itself from any attack.

The McCain team would have none of it and shot back with this:

This is a legitimate issue for the American people to think about. The reason for Hamas’ praise of Senator Obama’s foreign policy is his commitment to meet unconditionally with Iran — a nation whose president denies the Holocaust, threatens to wipe Israel off the map, funds terrorists and sends weapons to Iraq to kill American soldiers. Senator Obama’s positions present a radical departure from the longstanding bipartisan consensus for isolating rogue regimes like Iran and North Korea. It is not only responsible to raise these critical issues in this election, but it would be the height of irresponsibility not to have this discussion with the American people.

Well, I suspect the McCain camp wouldn’t mind extending this debate for a while. So long as the issue is Obama’s popularity with terrorist groups and his willingness to personally court America’s enemies, McCain comes out ahead. And Hillary Clinton, who has been doing some favors for McCain lately (e.g. praising McCain’s commander-in-chief credentials) is probably delighted with this dialogue as well.

Read Less




Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.