Commentary Magazine


Contentions

A Bad Day for New Politics

John McCain spent much of Thursday trying his best to convince voters that Barack Obama’s reneging on campaign finance reform is a breach of trust. The AP is annoyed with Obama and the networks are blasting him. Russ Feingold, good government types and Hillary Clinton provide fodder for McCain’s claim that Obama’s word can’t be trusted. The Wall Street Journal dryly noted: “The move, never attempted in three decades of public financing for presidential candidates, puts the Illinois senator in the position of being a self-styled reformer, pledged to diminish the influence of money in politics, who now plans to wage the most expensive campaign in history.”

Well, the media swarm was frankly the harshest treatment Obama has yet received. Had Obama not declared every other politician to be worthy of scorn, I’d say this issue wouldn’t matter. Had he not made himself into the messiah of New Politics  no one would care much. But having held himself up to some mythical standard (as his opponent has been known to do, as well) he is now reaping what he has sown–the disappointment that comes with failing to live up to unrealistic expectations.Is it game-changing? Certainly not in and of itself. But there is a deception factor building on this, NAFTA, Kyl-Lieberman, Jerusalem, and perhaps even Iraq. He is no longer the candidate who ran against Hillary, when he ran into the arms of the idealists and the Left. Now on numerous policy items there are changes, big changes in a very short period of time. It is jarring, at least for those who chose to believe in the Old Agent of Change, when he now turns on a dime.

Liberal apologists won’t care or will justify the latest Obama reversal (as needful “pragmatism“) as they have all the others, but they aren’t in “play” anyway in the general election. If independent voters really do care about “authenticity,” his New Politics may become less credible, indeed the subject of ridicule. If that is the case, he’ll be back to running as a run-of-the-mill liberal pol, or worse–a weak imitation of the Clintons’ craven political maneuvering.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.