Commentary Magazine


Contentions

The Battle Is On

Dueling media calls between the Obama and McCain camps took place today. The subject: Barack Obama’s New York Times op-ed. The gist is here and the complete McCain call is here. The McCain spokespeople, led by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and McCain foreign policy advisers Randy Scheunemann and Kori Schake, essentially made three arguments.

First, Graham and Scheuneman pressed home the point that Obama is “brazen” in his attempt to rewrite the past, he opposed the surge, and he made it harder for the surge to be implemented. And they contend that all of this — most especially his decision to “pull out” — would have left Iraq in chaos. Upping the ante, they accused Obama of playing politics at the expense of the country. Second, the McCain team claims that Obama still doesn’t get it. Graham was especially harsh, contending that Obama still doesn’t see that Iraqis a major battleground in the war on terror. Finally, the McCain team went after Obama for, as Scheunemann put it, “trying to have it both ways.” As Peter and I have pointed out, Obama’s ope-ed is a mix of denial, feigned shifts, status quo and opaqueness. What does he really mean and is he still sticking to his withdrawal at all costs plan?

On the Democratic side, the response seems to be: forget all that, McCain voted for the war. Before you point out that this is not relevant to the current discussion and doesn’t excuse Obama’s poor judgment and obfuscation, remember that the war is still not popular. And for those not following closely, that line may be fairly effective. (Not surprisingly the McCain team hit Obama spokesman Joe Biden for his determined advocacy for one of the worst ideas of the war: forcible partition of Iraq.)

The McCain team is doing all it can to turn Iraq (both on the merits and on Obama’s reaction to the surge’s success) into a broader issue of judgment, credibility and ultimately devotion to country above party. Scheunemann came right out and said it: Obama was banking on losing a war to win an election. Strong stuff.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.