Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Abortion Politics

Remember how Barack Obama was going to use abortion to pry women voters away from John McCain’s grasp? During the primary he swore up and down that he, rather than Hillary Clinton, was the one to best preserve abortion rights. He even got NARAL to endorse him over Clinton (to the great dismay of many) before the primary race was even over.

That was then. Now the gambit is to be mum on abortion. Some activists are not amused:

For some reason, they” — meaning the Obama campaign — “don’t emphasize [abortion]. They emphasize other issues. Basically this issue is very strongly held by Republican suburban women,” said Eleanor Smeal, President of the Feminist Majority Foundation. “Everyone keeps talking about shaving margins by reaching out to evangelicals. What about the suburban women who do want for themselves and daughters this fundamental right?”

(The umpteenth example of Democrats’ recognition that we have a right-of-center electorate is duly noted.)

On this issue, Obama’s change in emphasis is a low-risk strategy. Despite the earlier bold talk, the Obama camp must know that emphasizing Roe v. Wade isn’t going to help Obama with those values voters in key swing states. (Hence, he made the rather awkward and ultimately botched attempt to shade his abortion stance earlier this month.) Where are the single issue pro-choice voters going to go? Pro-life McCain isn’t going to win them over. Besides, there is a certain wink-wink quality to this pantomime between Obama and pro-choice voters, since Obama has made known his preference in judges – the single most important factor in abortion politics.

So is there any downside for Obama in shushing talk of abortion rights? The only risk is that those highly idealistic voters and former Hillary Clinton fans might lose faith in and decide they had rather not work for, or vote for, the Great Deceiver. (They can get in line with the disillusioned civil libertarians and the campaign reform/good government crowds, who aren’t getting what they bargained for, either.) The real danger for Obama, then, is the accumulation of the disenchanted activists. If you are banking on an army of faithful followers and small donors, there is only so much you can do to frustrate them before you feel a pinch.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.