Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Terrible, Just Terrible

Could it be that “the American people may be repelled at the sight of a man touring the planet in presidential style who has yet to even be nominated by his own party?” asks Howard Fineman. He then writes:

There is something a little off about Obamapalooza, even if it is not entirely the candidate’s fault. The self-conscious mimicking of J.F.K. can be cloying or even worse. Kennedy went to Berlin in the midst of a Cold War crisis. To stand at the Brandenburg Gate and declare “Ich bin ein Berliner” took enormous guts. Obama has yet to match that fortitude — and he hasn’t been chosen president. However quaint it may seem, voters may want a say in that decision.

But who exactly is contributing to the Obamapalooza if not the MSM of which Fineman is a tried and true member?

There is something perverse and deeply dishonest about the MSM throwing the ticker tape parade for Obama, gushing at every turn, and then turning around to wonder if it’s all a bit over the top. Rather than focus on the substance: McCain was right (they now concede) and Obama wrong, all they can do is marvel at the atmospherics. “Wow, isn’t it neat how he’s getting away with such appalling decision making and getting our applause!”

Moreover, in the two significant interviews of the trip — one with Terry Moran and the other with Katie Couric (the entire segment is a must-see)– Obama performed poorly and created more problems for himself by insisting on positions that seemed shaky (Still no support for the surge? He wants to spend the money on an energy policy instead?) and even going so far as to deny that he changed position on Jerusalem.

Rather than focus on their own accomplished and newsworthy interviews, the networks have continued to gush over the travel photos, almost as if their own interviews failed to turn up much new at all. That (like failing to object to the lack of access to Obama and to nondisclosure of basic data throughout the campaign) shows a shocking willingness to sacrifice even their own journalistic reputations and “standards” to boost their candidate of choice. As John said: scandalous.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.