Commentary Magazine


Contentions

The Republic of Ossetia?

“Today marks 18 years since the Republic of South Ossetia was proclaimed,” said Eduard Kokoity as his breakaway region celebrated its independence with a military parade in Tskhinvali yesterday.  “For 18 years, the people of South Ossetia have been proving their right to an equal place among other nations.”Prime Minister Putin must have been studying the Ossetian leader’s words with confusion, because in the last two weeks Kokoity has alternatively advocated that his region unify with Russia and maintain its claimed status as an independent state.  Now, Putin is undoubtedly alarmed as well: on Thursday the breakaway leader said that South Ossetia would retain its independence and seek to unify with North Ossetia.  North Ossetia is within the Russian Federation.

Moscow, it appears, has backed itself into a corner.  It has just fought a war for self-determination and recognized the independence of South Ossetia.  What could the Kremlin possibly say when Kokoity asks for a statehood referendum of all Ossetians?

If the people in both parts of Ossetia want to join together, then perhaps we should support them.  After all, President Bush’s “freedom agenda” surely is big enough to include the right to be governed by one’s own kind.

So if the Ossetians indeed want to form a more perfect union, let’s recognize they have a right to do so.  Americans, once populating a breakaway region of their own, should not be supporting the maintenance of failing multicultural empires.

Especially the one ruled from the Kremlin.  Russia, in the last month, has dropped any pretense of being a responsible great power.  By saying  it sees no benefit in World Trade Organization membership, it has essentially proclaimed it does not want to be part of the international community.  And by announcing its opposition to a fourth set of Security Council sanctions on Iran-as Moscow did yesterday-it has made clear it wants to be the world’s leading troublemaker.  So what’s the point of compromising our principles in order to placate hostile autocrats?


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.