I agree with John that she was weak, in the sense that she spent insufficient time on the economy, chose at key moments to interrupt Sarah Palin and never really got the two contenders to mix it up. Having sullied her reputation by not disclosing her conflict of interest, she further compromised it by a weak and ineffective job. That said, was she unfair? No. Will she regret her conduct before the debate in failing to reveal a conflict and then decrying “racism” when questioned about it? Doubtful.