Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Ditching the Dollar

On Tuesday, Vladimir Putin said that nations should move away from the American currency. “At the moment the world which is based on the dollar is suffering serious problems,” the Russian prime minister told a forum in Moscow. “In such conditions, we need to think about improving the payments system for bilateral trade, including the use of national currencies.” Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, in the Russian capital for a series of meetings, agreed. “We need to diversify the global currency system, to support its stability through the use of different currencies,” he said.

Wen’s comments were a more polite version of a series of anti-dollar comments that have appeared in People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s flagship publication. “The U.S. is, by taking advantage of its dollar hegemony, grabbing the global wealth,” said a commentary published on Friday. “Therefore, the dollar-pegged payments in the international trade transactions must be shattered.”

It’s besides the point that China and Russia cannot conduct trade with each other in either of their own currencies for a variety of legal, technical, and economic reasons. And it is also irrelevant that parties around the world, supposedly disadvantaged by the greenback, are rushing into the currency at this time, apparently looking for refuge from worldwide turmoil. The important point is that these two nations, which will participate in the mid-November discussions in Washington to reshape the global financial architecture, are trying to undermine the United States at a time of severe economic stress.

Of course, Russia and China, as sovereign states, have the right to seek short-term advantage, create instability, and act irresponsibly. Yet the Bush administration is ignoring their hostile moves and continues to treat them as friends, inviting the pair to help restructure the world’s currency system and review international regulation of the financial markets.

Russia and China have, in a very real sense, declared economic warfare on the United States. They obviously have no trouble acting in their own perceived interests. Yet Washington seems unable to stand up for ours. Our troubles, as serious as they may be, are not so great that we must invite our adversaries to help decide our future.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.