Commentary Magazine


Contentions

NATO in Israel?

In recent days and weeks, some people were entertaining the idea of having NATO patrol the Palestinian territories as part of a comprehensive peace deal between the Palestinian Authority and Israel. The reemergence of this idea was partially based on the assumption that General Jim Jones, Obama’s new National Security Advisor, favors it. Another Obama advisor, Samantha Power, has hinted in the past that such force might be the way to go.

Of course, Israel was never enthusiastic about the possibility of having an international force in charge of its defense–and the inability of such force to control Hezbollah in Lebanon did not make it more appealing. So for Israel it was always a resounding no:

NATO is a very bad idea,” the officer said. “No other country in the world has successfully dealt with terror like Israel has. There is a need for continuous combat; NATO will not want to endanger its soldiers on behalf of Israeli citizens.

Nevertheless, this bad idea refuses to die. Israel’s reluctance was often interpreted by proponents as the instinctive negativity of a country that isn’t yet ready for the real compromises needed for real peace.

But hopefully, the last word on this matter, at least for a while, was heard today. Another resounding no–but this time people might actually listen, because it comes from NATO:

“NATO is not a player in this matter. I believe NATO has no mandate to operate on the Israeli-Palestinian issue unless an agreement is reached, unless there is a United Nations Security Council resolution, and unless the region’s countries, headed by Israel of course, ask for NATO presence in order to secure peace.

“If these conditions are met, I believe NATO will hold serious discussion,” said [NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop] Scheffer, addressing the idea to station a NATO force in the West Bank or Gaza Strip.

So, it is a no for now, and “discussion” later. Fortunately (but only in this case), NATO discussions tend to be a very long process.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.