Commentary Magazine


Contentions

New York’s Biggest Losers

There are many reasons to criticize Caroline Kennedy’s bid to replace Hillary Clinton as U.S. Senator from New York.  For starters, it takes a tremendous amount of chutzpah – and I mean this in the greedy, not gutsy, way – to seek appointment to a high political office without a day of meaningful experience in public service.

Moreover, to the extent that she is attractive solely on account of her last name – and all the fundraising dollars that it can produce – her appointment would represent everything that this country is supposed to be against.  It is, excuse my redundancy, worth emphasizing that this is an appointment: Hillary Clinton and George W. Bush may have similarly benefited from their last names, but at least they had to prove their political mettle in competitive elections before taking office.  If New York Governor David Paterson ultimately selects her, Caroline Kennedy will have been handed a Senate seat for no apparent reason other than having been born a Kennedy.  So much for her pre-Super Tuesday experiment of promoting “change” in America.

Still, it’s impossible to ignore that this is the second time in a decade that New York Democrats have turned to a “name” – rather than promoting from within – in selecting a U.S. Senate candidate.  This is truly incredible.  After all, New York’s House delegation – the typical talent pool for Senate candidates – contains 23 Democrats (22 if you exclude the Congressman under investigation).  How have these Congressmen – most of whom have served in Washington for over a decade – so blatantly failed to build meaningful public profiles for themselves beyond their districts?  How have they so pathetically permitted outsiders – first a former first lady of Arkansas, and now a neophyte named Kennedy – to seize their opportunities for promotion?

It may be too late to stop the Caroline Kennedy juggernaut.  But, sooner or later, New York Democrats will have to ask how – despite decades of House delegation dominance – they found themselves in the position of needing a Clinton or Kennedy to preserve a Senate seat. Where are the apparent losers that they’ve been nominating for safely gerrymandered House seats all these years – the folks who were supposed to be the next generation of statewide leaders? Without this soul-searching, New Yorkers may soon realize that they have been re-electing clowns biennially for far too long.

Or, so one can hope.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.