Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Let Israel Finish the Job

In his Washington Post column, Charles Krauthammer lays out the two possible endgames in Israel’s war against Hamas: (A) a Lebanon-like cessation of hostilities to be supervised by international observers, or (B) the disintegration of Hamas rule in Gaza. Krauthammer spends the rest of the column arguing (in flawless fashion) why the only acceptable option is the latter.

According to Krauthammer:

The fall of Hamas rule in Gaza is within reach, but only if Israel does not cave in to pressure to stop now. Overthrowing Hamas would not require a permanent Israeli reoccupation. A transitional international force would be brought in to immediately make way for the return of the Palestinian Authority, the legitimate government whose forces will be far less squeamish than the Europeans in establishing order in Gaza.

The disintegration of Hamas rule in Gaza would be a devastating blow to Palestinian rejectionists, who since the Hamas takeover of Gaza have been the ascendant “strong horse” in Palestinian politics. It would be a devastating blow to Iran as patron of radical Islamist movements throughout the region, particularly after the defeat and marginalization of Iran’s Sadrist client in Iraq. It would encourage the moderate Arab states to continue their U.S.-allied confrontation of Iran and its proxies. And it would demonstrate Israel’s irreplaceable strategic value to the U.S. in curbing and containing Iran’s regional ambitions.

The danger, according to Krauthammer, is that, “Under tremendous international pressure — including from an increasingly wobbly U.S. State Department — the government of Ehud Olmert has begun hinting that it is receptive to a French-Egyptian cease-fire plan, essentially acquiescing to Endgame A.”

Krauthammer concludes his column this way:

The one-step-from-madness gangster theocracy in Gaza — just four days before the fighting, the Hamas parliament passed a Sharia criminal code, legalizing, among other niceties, crucifixion — is teetering on the brink. It can be brought down, but only if Israel is prepared — and allowed — to complete the real mission of this war. For the Bush State Department, in its last significant act, to prevent that with the premature imposition of a cease-fire would be not just self-defeating but shameful.

President Bush has been as stalwart a friend as Israel has had in the Oval Office. He understands, for both geopolitical and moral reasons, why our sustained support for Israel is crucial. That is doubly so in Israel’s war against terrorists organizations like Hamas, which is supported by Iran. Crippling Hamas would not only be a great good in its own right (destroying sadistic regimes is a mark of civilizational progress); it is crucial if there are any hopes for an authentic “peace process” to take place. We need more nations like Jordan and fewer like Hamas controlled Gaza.

Israel is carrying the freight in this conflict. What it needs from America is not blood or treasure; Israel simply needs us not to pressure her into a premature ceasefire that will undo the good that may be achieved.

The Bush presidency is ending with Iraq on the mend and al Qaeda and the Mahdi Army on the run. It would be a nice capstone to conclude Bush’s two terms in office with Hamas as a broken and discredited entity. Militant Islam is in retreat within the Islamic and Arab world; the defeat of Hamas would help accelerate that process.

Over the years, many in the West have grown weary in the face of the struggle in which we (and Israel) are engaged. But President Bush, to his everlasting credit, has been relentless in staying on the offensive against terrorism. In arguably his greatest speech – his September 20, 2001 address to a Joint Session of Congress – the President said this:

Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there.  It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated.

In the final days of the Bush Presidency one such terrorist group, Hamas, may be on the verge of defeat, thanks to Israel. We need to allow Israel to complete this task and, in the process, keep faith with her in her struggle against evil.

Introducing Commentary Complete

19 Responses to “Let Israel Finish the Job”

  1. Jonas Menchik says:

    “But don’t worry, the Times insists that all that means is that this “add[s] urgency to increasing dialogue with Tehran.”

    juxtapose the Times sense of urgency with their leader –

    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1235898326581&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

    The current liberal motto — create urgency to move fast with failed ideas!!!

  2. Rick says:

    If I were Iranian I wouldn’t like Sally Fields. I really wouldn’t like Sally Fields.

  3. Bob Miller says:

    They should send the actor who starred as Alexander the Great.

  4. William R. Casey says:

    Who would give credibility to a pea brain whose only life experiance has been pretending to be someone else and reading lines someone else wrote? All intellect proceeds directly
    from God and man cannot prevent its UNEQUAL distribution.

  5. Joe says:

    I think Hollywood SHOULD apologize to Iran. For Pauly Shore movies, at least, those were really bad.

    But seriously, we should ALL apologize to Iran – right after they apologize for the ’79 hostage taking, the Beirut barracks bombing, 30+ years of being the #1 state sponsor of international terrorism, their role in the Jewish center bombings in Argentina, their role in the Khobar Towers bombing, their role in backing and supplying those who killed our troops in Iraq, their role in supporting and arming Hezbollah and Hamas, their pursuit of nuclear weapons, their ugly repression of women and gays, their destablizing influence across the Middle East, their complete squelching of individual liberties in the Islamic republic, etc. etc. etc. etc.

    So yes, absolutely, let’s get right on that apology to Iran.

  6. mds123 says:

    admiral mullen JCS v annette bening, excellent actress & wife of warren beatty…

    of COURSE the times covers ms benning more extensively…this is – pun intended – ‘news’?

    the times knows its audience and it ain’t the people who are interested in what the chairman of the joint chief has to say about iran; it’s for people who say hurray for hollywood

  7. Alan Luxenberg says:

    At least the Hollywood delegation didn’t apologize for the Sally Fields film!
    But maybe that’s coming.

  8. lester says:

    that was good movie.

  9. Obamaton says:

    Maybe Annette Bening and the Film Actor’s Guild can fly Hans Blix to Iran so he can assure the world the mullahs have no evil nuclear intentions.