Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Condi’s UN Embarrassment

In today’s Wall Street Journal, former UN ambassador John Bolton rightly criticizes the Bush administration for abstaining on a Security Council resolution calling for a cease-fire in Gaza.

He writes:

That’s no way to lead. If Washington concluded that a harsh resolution on Gaza was warranted, the proper course was to vote for it. And that is, apparently, what Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had hoped to do. Speaking to the Security Council, Ms. Rice endorsed the basic content of the British draft, saying “this resolution is a step toward our goals.” She also said that the U.S. was abstaining to give Egypt’s ongoing mediation efforts time to work.

The Palestinian Authority’s foreign minister, however, indicates that there may have been another reason. He said publicly  Ms. Rice told him just before the vote that she had “been given new instructions” (certainly from President George W. Bush) not to support the draft.

Today’s Jerusalem Post gives us a more complete answer as to what happened, at least according to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert<.
Speaking today in Ashkelon, Olmert bragged that he dragged Bush out of a speech in Philadelphia and told him he didn’t want Rice to vote for the resolution:

I [called the White House and] said, ‘Get President Bush on the phone.’ They tried and told me he was in the middle of a lecture in Philadelphia. I said ‘I’m not interested, I need to speak to him right now.’ He got down from the podium, went out and took the phone call. I told him the US cannot possibly vote for this resolution. He immediately called the secretary of state and told her not to vote for it. She was left quite embarrassed.

Olmert ought not to be speaking publicly in this manner about his country’s only ally. While I doubt that it all went down exactly as he says (as I doubt just about everything that man says), this sort of loose talk is insulting to the United States and to Bush, who has been a good friend to Olmert. The sooner this ethically challenged politician is out of office the better it will be for Israel.
As for Rice, she should be embarrassed. As Bolton writes:

In the past, both Democratic and Republican administrations reacted to one-sided, anti-Israel resolutions by vetoing them.

That is exactly what the U.S. should have done in this case.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.