Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Let’s Get Some Answers

In a measured tone, Prof. Peter Berkowitz of the Hoover Institution asks President Obama some thoughtful questions on the legal aspects of keeping the nation safe:

How will the U.S. handle and detain suspected terrorists after the closing of Guantanamo?

“Under what circumstances, if any, should the law permit CIA interrogators to depart from military interrogation rules?”

What will the legal procedure be for trying terrorist suspects — military commissions, federal courts, new tribunal with special additions?

What position will the Obama administration take toward the International Criminal Court, and, specifically, should its authorizing treaty be submitted for ratification?

“Under what circumstances would President Obama order the use of American military force in the absence of a U.N. Security Council Resolution authorization?”

“What further rethinking does America’s law of surveillance require following the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act’s passage last year?”

“Should the U.S. continue the practice of targeted killings, and if so under what circumstances?”

All these are important, complicated questions (and there are more in the article itself), and although he does not say as much, there’s a domino quality to Berkowitz’ presentation: the way the Obama team answers each question will necessarily impact many of the other questions. One major problem for the new legal team in dealing with these questions is the obligation to maintain security without having the clarifying “advantage” of a crisis:

A paradox in the struggle against terrorism is that we define success by prevention, yet successful prevention, because much of it goes unnoticed, causes vigilance to wane, and the public to grow more complacent.

Of course, Berkowitz is being optimistic here. He says it’s “the public” that grows more complacent — but the real question behind all the other questions he asks is this: is it just the public that has grown more complacent or is it the new administration, too?



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.