Commentary Magazine


Contentions

A Foolish Egyptian Non Sequitur

In today’s New York Times, Egyptian novelist Alaa al-Aswany poignantly describes many Egyptians’ initial fascination with President Barack Obama:

Our admiration for Mr. Obama is grounded in what he represents: fairness. He is the product of a just, democratic system that respects equal opportunity for education and work. This system allowed a black man, after centuries of racial discrimination, to become president.

This fairness is precisely what we are missing in Egypt.

Of course, this is precisely the reaction that many of Obama’s supporters had in mind – that Obama’s symbolism would provide an immediate opening for appealing to Middle Eastern publics.  In turn, his proponents argued, Obama would become a uniquely compelling voice for improving relations with the Muslim world, and would further inspire those struggling for political freedom.

Well, not so fast.  Even before taking office, Obama had already lost al-Aswany – and for reasons that have nothing to do with Egypt.  Check out this logical non sequitur, which al-Aswany serves up with an extra helping of indignant moral fuzziness:

We welcomed him with almost total enthusiasm until he underwent his first real test: Gaza. Even before he officially took office, we expected him to take a stand against Israel’s war on Gaza. We still hope that he will condemn, if only with simple words, this massacre that killed more than 1,300 Palestinians, many of them civilians. (I don’t know what you call it in other languages, but in Egypt we call this a massacre.) … We also wanted Mr. Obama … to recognize what we see as a simple, essential truth: the right of people in an occupied territory to resist military occupation.

In this case, you can’t blame President Obama for failing to meet expectations.  After all, al-Aswany apparently anticipated that Obama would not only blame Israel for its counterattack on Gaza, but would further support Hamas’s rocket attacks as “resistance.”  Only a fiction writer (and Stephen Walt) could possibly see such a scenario as possible, let alone morally just.

Still, there is a greater tragedy in al-Aswany’s op-ed – namely, that the Egyptian novelist has favored the Palestinian issue over the plight of his 75 million compatriots, who are struggling under brutal authoritarianism.  This is part of a broader trend: non-Islamist Egyptian dissidents, having lost faith that anything will change in Egyptian politics, have increasingly sought a voice through the Palestinian issue.  Of course, the Egyptian regime welcomes this shift in advocacy: it knows that pro-Palestinian rants such as al-Aswany’s discredit its detractors to American policymakers, which is why the regime only allows dissidents to achieve prominence when they are staunchly anti-Israel.

In turn, al-Aswany has produced a mammoth failure in his New York Times debut: not only will his op-ed fail to generate U.S. support for Hamas, but it will also reinforce support for the very regime that keeps him in its crosshairs.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.