Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Re: The Prince and His Courtiers

Pete, I never underestimate the media’s willingness to ride to the rescue of a beleaguered liberal, but aside from the embarrassing cheerleading by Anderson Cooper et. al. there is a fair amount of rather critical press analysis going on. Perhaps the print (or online) media is less inclined to run interference for the Obama administration than the niche cable networks.

Bloomberg calls it part of his “stumbling start.” Lynn Sweet points out that the Obama team is “having trouble duplicating the well oiled Obama campaign.” The New York Times reminds us of Obama’s ongoing problems and the Washington Post editors actually take the White House to task.

So even the mainstream media admits that the Obama team has, at the very least, tripped themselves up. Certainly the left blogosphere and its allies at MSNBC will express horror that those mean Republicans would point out all the pork in the stimulus and the partisan overreach. But the problem with that spin is two-fold:

First, in order to explain the Republicans’ combativeness it is necessary to explain what it is they are griping about. (This Politico story is a good example.) The Republicans are no doubt delighted to get help on that front. Second, it is hard to escape the facts. Tom Daschle and Tim Geithner, not to mention the Performance Czarina, did have tax “problems.” The ethics waivers have been tossed around like confetti.

And, yes, the stimulus is a liberal land-grab with hundreds of pages of non-stimulative largess. It is hardly the model of bipartisanship or transparency, even the A.P. concedes. Slate likewise acknowledges:

In this case, not only is the end product ragged—some of the elements aren’t terribly stimulative—but the means were ugly. The differences between the House and Senate bills were reconciled mostly in secret by House and Senate Democratic leaders, three Northeastern Republicans, and White House aides. This is hardly unusual for Washington—which is precisely the problem: It’s not the change Obama promised.

So I don’t think the Democrats should rest on their laurels. There is only so much the MSM can do to help them out of the hole they are digging. When you act like a hyper-partisan Chicago pol, minus the ruthless efficiency, it catches up with you.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.