Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Too Grande to Fail

Jonathan Last tracks the rise and fall of Starbucks with the boom and bust progress of our economy and concludes:

Today, Starbucks is laying off workers, both at the retail level and at headquarters. It has tried to find savings in unlikely places – such as changing the recipe for its banana bread. It recently made headlines by announcing that it would no longer brew drip decaf coffee in the afternoons unless a customer requested one. Expect to see the same types of gonzo attempts at savings in other industries soon.

It’s fun to root against Starbucks in the same way we root against Microsoft Corp. or the Yankees. But if Starbucks is a harbinger for the rest of our economy, we better hope that Americans go back to buying their overpriced, over-roasted coffee – soon.

But wait, we can’t let the cruel, harsh marketplace decide something as important as this, can we? Millions of Americans depend on Starbucks and it offers all that employment. What to do?  In the Democrats’ economic vision, shouldn’t we be rushing to pass a Starbucks stimulus plan.

First, we give Starbucks a few billion dollars. Second, we have the taxpayers buy up all those unused, icky — dare I say “toxic” — breakfast sandwiches no one liked.  Then we give tax incentives for people to buy more Starbucks drinks. And when they still won’t return to their previous buying habits, we give them coffee loans, or badger banks to give them coffee financing. Then we tell Starbucks that since they are now on the dole there won’t be any big salaries or bonuses for Starbucks executives. And if Starbucks still isn’t making money we call Dunkin’ Donuts in, read ‘em the riot act and tell them to merge with their upscale competitors.

But what if there were just too many Starbucks, or they weren’t priced correctly? Maybe consumers would rather not incur more debt by taking out coffee loans. Or maybe they’d rather drink Diet Coke all day. Well, that’s just too darn bad. Starbucks is now a government-subsidized operation responsible to the “taxpayers.” And they better repay all those loans. If after all that we have more Starbucks than consumers want or need, and Starbucks doesn’t take whatever steps are needed to put their  coffee houses in order, and the better executive talent has now decamped to McDonalds that’s just the natural, dismal result of  . .  well, it must be  George Bush’s fault. Right?


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.