Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Hillary to Gilad Shalit: Drop Dead

Both Haaretz and the New York Post report today that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has sent several “angry messages” to Israel in the past week complaining about the flow of goods and services to the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip. While Israel has never, even during the worst of the fighting, announced it wanted to shut off all aid to Gaza, it has quite reasonably demanded that if the Islamist rulers of this area want aid and other materials to flow, they must agree to a long-term cease-fire and release Gilad Shalit, the Israeli soldier kidnapped in a cross-border raid in the summer of 2006.

The Israelis have attempted to ransom Shalit by releasing a host of Palestinian terrorists, but they don’t think the question of Shalit can or should be separated from Hamas’s demand for opening the floodgates into Gaza (which would inevitably invite the terrorist group to re-arm, re-stock their munitions caches, and gather more raw materials for missile workshops.)

But that insistence on Shalit’s release interferes with Hillary Clinton’s current self-appointment as the defender of the Palestinians of Gaza, a posture through which she hopes to score points with the Arab and Islamic world. The secretary’s recent trip to Indonesia reveals this as a priority.

“Aid should never be used as a political weapon,” said Clinton’s State Department spokesman Robert Wood. If we accept that as a principle of American foreign policy, does that mean that kidnapping is okay?

Clinton’s criticism of Israel’s stand on Shalit will only strengthen Hamas’s bargaining position. And if she uses her visit to Israel next week to hammer Ehud Olmert on this point, the likely result of this little piece of “peace processing” will be Olmert acquiescing to Palestinian demands on border crossings. That may well mean that Gilad Shalit will remain in captivity for who knows how much longer.

All those New Yorkers who were convinced by the sincerity of Clinton’s faithful support of Israel during her eight years in the Senate representing the Empire State can now officially eat crow. But that’s no help to Gilad Shalit or his parents.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.