Commentary Magazine


Contentions

The Real Story Isn’t in the Critics, Fellas

As Jamie notes, having now discovered the Chas Freeman story, the New York Times and Washington Post news sections are focusing not on how the pick was made, why he wasn’t vetted, whether Admiral Blair was duped, or on any other aspect of the Obama administration’s debacle. What excites them is explaining why all the Jews opposed the pick. No, really.

We almost filled a high-level security position with a man who thinks the responsibility for 9-11 goes both ways. We nearly gave classified information to someone who thinks Jews control all debate in America. But the story, according to those papers, isn’t about Freeman. Or Blair. Or the White House. It’s about the Jews.

Neither paper seems aware of Nancy Pelosi’s role. Neither mentions the letter from eighty-seven Chinese dissidents. Neither cites Freeman’s affectionate quotes about Mao or King Abdullah, nor his sympathy for the crackdown in Tienanmen Square.

Freeman was so obviously a “crackpot,” as multiple editorial boards have now discovered, that it is shocking Blair picked and defended him. The effort to turn the table on Freeman’s critics only works if the public remains ignorant of just how vile Freeman’s words were.

Walter Pincus’s tale in the Washington Post is especially noteworthy. While reciting the names of several Jewish bloggers who wrote critically of Freeman, he assumes — without interviewing them or quoting any of their work — that they were motivated solely because of Israel or some nefarious direction from former AIPAC lobbyist Steve Rosen. You see, Jews don’t have opinions or motivations apart from those connected to Israel. (And he omits mention of the Reason bloggers because they don’t really fit the profile of neocon Jews.) But Pincus can’t entirely conceal a glaring fact: this story raged for weeks with nary a word from him.

And for the real story — how a nominee this temperamentally ill-suited and intellectually warped would have gotten the nod — I suspect we will have to turn to other publications.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.