Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Bibi Says No To Linkage

Broadly speaking, there are two schools of thought on the Israeli-Arab conflict. The traditional State Department/Arabist/Leftist approach holds that the ongoing statelessness of the Palestinians is a profound burden on the consciences of Arabs everywhere and the inspiration for radicalism in the region. Thus, the first step in tempering the restiveness of the Middle East is to address the Palestinian problem. Solve this, says everyone from Zbigniew Brzezinski to European diplomats to Arab autocrats, and the solutions to most other conundrums in the Middle East will come into view.

The competing school holds that, to the extent Arab radicalism is shaped by current events — this is a big qualifier — it is intentionally fomented by regional factions for whom unrest, violence, and dissatisfaction serve strategic purposes. There are good reasons, in other words, why Iran and Syria support Hezbollah and Hamas, one of which is the capacity of these groups to keep America and Israel mired in diplomatic failure. (Martin Kramer has written at length on this “myth of linkage.”)

Uzi Arad is expected to be Netanyahu’s national security adviser, and in an interview with Reuters he said the following:

“No one in his right mind would do a deal with Syria, let alone do the concessions that Mr. Olmert alluded to, if it remained aligned with Iran. It would just bring Iran closer to us,” Arad told Reuters…. “The more Iran becomes strong, the closer it gets to nuclear weapons, the more terrified the moderates in the Arab world and the Palestinian people become, and the more emboldened the radicals and the extremists are,” Arad said. “So whichever way you look at it the order of priority is: blunt Iran first, move vigorously on peace after, and based on that. Should you act in the wrong order…you will have a sterile, perhaps failed process with the Palestinians and at the same time you will end up with a nuclear Iran.”

Translation: radicalism makes addressing the Palestinian problem impossible, not the other way around. The first obligation of strategists, before considerations of ideology or interests, is to accurately perceive reality, and then allow priorities to derive from that assessment.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.