Commentary Magazine


Contentions

What’s in a Name?

Language can be very revealing. So far, the Obama administration has given clear indicators as to who it identifies as the nation’s real enemies.

First up, vague as the “War on Terror” was, it’s now a taboo term. The administration replaced it with “overseas contingency operations” — a phrase so devoid of content that it is the Olestra of the English language.

Next, terrorist attacks themselves were redefined into “man-caused disasters.” (Let’s overlook, for the moment, the inherent sexism of that phrase, although Bernardine Dohrn would take offense.)

Finally, the Obama administration found an area where they could use the term “terrorist” and “terrorism” freely — and that was in the Department of Homeland Security’s report on the threat of right-wing extremism. Now, they couldn’t find very much evidence to back up their broad generalities and concerns (Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing makes a very lonely data point), but they did manage to cast aspersions on such devious, subversive elements as returning veterans.

Meanwhile, other prominent Democrats reacted to this week’s Tea Parties with some very strong language — throwing around terms such as “despicable,” “racist,”  “AstroTurfed,” and the like.

Oddly enough, they didn’t employ those terms to describe the protests at the recent G-20 gathering in London, the routine domestic terrorism of the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth Liberation Front, or even the recent silencing of former Representative Tom Tancredo at the University of North Carolina.

The conclusion seems pretty clear: the real terrorists, the real threat to American security, are not Islamist militants who have vowed to destroy America. No, the real terrorists are those who didn’t vote for Democrats, who stubbornly assert their independence, who insist on placing a high value on their rights, who believe strongly in such heretical concepts as the 1st, 2nd, and 10th Amendments to the United States Constitution, and even those who have sought out training in weapons and tactics by enlisting in the U.S. military.

Thanks for clearing that up, folks.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.