Commentary Magazine


Contentions

What a Tangled Web She Weaves

The only person who had a rougher week than the president on the meandering approach to the interrogation memos and potential prosecution of Bush administration officials was Nancy Pelosi. As Politico points out, Pelosi “didn’t cry foul” when she was briefed as early as 2002 on the interrogation techniques. And she made things worse last week:

Pelosi’s allies were less prepared to confront the fallout from her convoluted answers during three sessions with reporters last week — answers that raised new questions and handed Republicans a fresh line of attack on a speaker at the height of her power.

“I’m puzzled, I don’t understand what she’s trying to say,” said Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.), former chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and currently the committee’s ranking minority member.

“I don’t have any sympathy for her — she’s the speaker of the House; there should be some accountability. She shouldn’t be given a pass,” added Hoekstra.

And so there is plenty of fodder for Pelosi’s critics — and plenty to distract her as she tries to push through Obama’s already controversial agenda. It is unclear whether the tempest will be enough to dissuade her from pressing forward with her witch hunt.

She has become the symbol of Congressional hypocrisy — the leader of those whose moral preening knows no bounds but who understood and acknowledged at one time that these techniques were necessary. And she presents quite clearly the dilemma for those calling for a public inquisition: where is this all leading? The Left would like Bush era officials indicted, banished, imprisoned, and impeached for their supposed moral obtuseness, provided someone can find some statute under which to prosecute them. But if a lawyer who drafted the interrogation memos in good faith should be impeached according to the howling Left, why should Pelosi continue to reign supreme?

Well perhaps she can clear it up in the Truth Commission. Her Republican colleagues certainly would be pleased to hear her spell out her views. And there are, we now know, plenty of witnesses and a good deal of documentation to help refresh her memory.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.