Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Specter’s Switcheroo

Here in Philadelphia, the local television networks are abuzz with news that Senator Arlen Specter has switched parties.  Specter’s detractors and supporters will likely spend the next few weeks debating whether the longtime Republican has sold out his party or, alternatively, finally bought into the Democrats’ policy agenda after many years of being a Republican.  Either way, a few points are in order:

1. The MSM that once hailed former Vermont Senator Jim Jeffords’s party-switch as “brave” should control itself.  Far from brave, Specter’s move is nothing short of an exercise in outright survival: Specter was trailing so far behind GOP primary challenger Pat Toomey in the polls that he seemingly had no choice but to switch parties.  And even if this weren’t the case, Specter’s move reeks of political opportunism on the national level.  At least Jeffords had the temerity to buck the recently-elected president’s party when he caucused with the Democrats – and thereby gave them the Senate majority – in mid-2001.  Specter, on the other hand, is joining the president’s party and – assuming that Al Franken is declared the winner in Minnesota – has given Obama’s agenda a filibuster-proof free-ride in the Senate.  Our system of checks and balances has rarely been so fragile, and this fact should temper the MSM’s excitement.  (But don’t count on it.)

2. Pennsylvania Republicans played their part in this.  Much as Connecticut Democrats’ decision to reject Joseph Lieberman in the 2006 Senate primaries in favor of Ned Lamont ultimately came back to bite the party – Lieberman, after all, won the state-wide race as an independent – Republicans do not help their prospects by rejecting a figure from their own party who has long represented state-wide political consensus.  Granted, a left-wing Republican might not serve many Republicans’ policy priorities effectively – but neither will representation by two Senate Democrats.

3. With a filibuster-proof majority, the Democrats have reached a major political peak.  How long they stand on this peak is an open question.  But Republicans have physics on their side: what goes up must come down.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.