Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Not So Much Change We Can Believe In

James Capretta comes up with a smart conservative response to ObamaCare — let employer-provided healthcare go on as it is and build an alternative “consumer-driven marketplace outside of employer-provided care.” He explains:

In general, it should be something like the program through which federal employees select their coverage every year from competing private insurers. Eligible state residents would have sufficient information about the offerings, and their tax credit would get sent automatically to the plan of their choice. States would be required to ensure that the price and quality differences between competing options were clear, transparent, and easily accessible via the Internet. When residents chose more expensive plans, they would pay the difference out of their own pockets. When they chose less expensive plans, they would get to keep every dollar saved.

No, it isn’t easy to explain, but it may be the only viable alternative to a public-option plan that would surely morph into a nationalized single-payer plan. And it does avoid the concern from voters — which the Obama team is wrestling with — that a great number of people want to just keep what they have.

Indeed, some polling data suggests voters aren’t inclined to accept all that much change. A new Rasmussen poll shows:

Forty-two percent (42%) of Americans say every one in the United States should have free health care. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 44% disagree. However, by a two-to-one margin (60% to 27%), Americans reject free health care for all if it means changing their own coverage and joining a program administered by the government.

It’s good to see Americans are opposed to “free things”– because they are never free. But it is also interesting,  as Capretta argues, how many Americans like what they have. And it raises the question as to why this administration is bent on destroying a very popular system to solve a confined problem (the uninsured). Nevertheless, the “winning” solution is going to be one that offers “reform” but recognizes Americans’ reluctance to throw the baby out with the bathwater. In that regard, Capretta’s contribution is an important one.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.