Commentary Magazine


Contentions

How Do You Say “Incoherence” in Arabic?

The president has, to put it mildly, been sending mixed messages about what he intends to do and say about the non-existent Peace Process. Coming up empty handed, because of course there is no viable Palestinian government to negotiate with, he took to the airwaves to bully Israel. That, as we reported yesterday, went over like a lead balloon in the U.S. So now his team is out spinning and back-tracking. Ben Smith reports:

The White House is reassuring Jewish groups that it will strive on good terms with Israel’s government, handling the issue of settlements “quietly, professionally, and without rancor or ultimatums.”

“While we may have some differences of view with Israel at the moment over settlements, we are trying to work through them quietly, professionally, and without rancor or ultimatums, as befits a strong relationship with an important ally,” a White House official wrote to an offiical the Jewish Council for Public Affairs. “We are confident we can do that.”

Actually, they aren’t working quietly — they are bullying Israel in advance of Obama’s trip to the Middle East to gain . . . . well, to gain what isn’t clear. But the entire spin is quite, shall we say, audacious. Take this portion of the administration’s email which Smith quotes:

[The president] does believe Israel has an obligation to stop settlements – that is clearly what Israel agreed to in the Roadmap.

Well, and what did the U.S. promise with regard to the Roadmap? Is the Obama administration standing by the U.S. government’s letter to Ariel Sharon in 2004? Obama isn’t saying. So perhaps the only country that must keep its obligations is Israel.

This sounds suspiciously like other hare-brained maneuvers the Obama administration has undertaken (e.g. release of the detainee abuse photos, closing Guantanamo). The president makes some grand pronouncement and soaks of the applause of one or another left-wing group. Word gets out that what the president is suggesting is ludicrous (e.g. there is no better place to put the Guantanamo terrorists, there is sense in bullying Israel to make unilateral concessions) and so a hasty bit of spin must ensue. This is a poor way to run national security policy. Soon both our allies and foes will learn not to listen when Obama speaks.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.