Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Near and Dear

Even before yesterday excusing the 32 words from Sotomayor’s 2001 Berkeley speech as some type of slip was not holding up well. It was a “slip” or a “misstatement” or a “poor choice of words.” But Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus spotted the silliness of that spin — it was after all presented to a law school gathering and reprinted months later for a law review article. Maybe it was a joke, offered Paul Krugman.

Then word came on Wednesday that the speach was given in similar form some seven years earlier. Greg Sargent quotes this paragraph from the earlier version:

“Justice O’Connor has often been cited as saying that “a wise old man and a wise old woman reach the same conclusion in dueling cases. I am not so sure Justice O’Connor is the author of that line since Professor Resnik attributes the line to Supreme Court Justice Coyle. I am not so sure that I agree with the statement. First, if Prof. Martha Minnow is correct, there can never be a universal definition of ‘wise.’ Second, I would hope that a wise woman with the richness of her experience would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion.”

Well, it’s not exactly the same — it’s a statement of gender rather than ethnic superiority. And she doesn’t add the final dig at white males which appears in the 2001 version. But yes the sentiment is vaguely the same.

Did the Senate “miss this” for her Second Circuit confirmation hearing? Perhaps, or perhaps the 1994 version left out the more egregious sentiments found in the 2001 speech. But the Senators know about it now. And the woman is nominated for the Supreme Court. Everything matters a lot more. What we now know is that the speech or some version of it appeared to be near and dear to her heart — a sentiment that stuck with her and was worth repeating as the years passed. And was worth reprinting for a law review article.  One thing is for sure: the Democrats need to go back to the drawing board for some new excuses.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.