Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Time Ticking

While conservatives may have had their hopes raised for a complete invalidation of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, there is reason for advocates of a colorblind society to be cheered. It seems time is on their side.

Tom Goldstein has it right on the Supreme Court’s ruling:

Though the Supreme Court by a wide margin today formally declined to resolve a challenge to the constitutionality of Section 5, the reality is far different. The decision unambiguously served notice that the Justices are prepared to invalidate the statute as it stands. Congress is now effectively on the clock: it has the period between now and the date that it decides a follow-on challenge by a covered jurisdiction that is not permitted to ‘bail out’ of the statutory scheme to amend Section 5. If the statute remains the same by the time the next case arrives, the Court will invalidate the statute.

His entire post is worth reading, but the upshot is clear: the days when the liberal civil rights lobby could rely on past discrimination to justify extraordinary federal supervision of all elections are running out.

But then the public’s patience with identity politics is ebbing. We also had news that voters will have another opportunity to vote down racial preferences:

Arizonans will vote next year on a proposed state constitutional amendment to generally prohibit state and local governments from discrimination and preferential treatment based on race, ethnicity and sex. The House already approved the measure Thursday, so Senate passage on a 17-11 vote without debate Monday sends the measure championed by Republican legislators and California activist Ward Connerly to Arizona’ November 2010 ballot. If Arizona voters approve the amendment, the state would join four other states – California, Nebraska, Michigan and Washington – that have approved versions.

I wonder why the 11 state senators didn’t want to debate an important issue like this on the merits, but perhaps it has to do with public sentiment about quotas and racial preferences. It seems that neither public opinion nor time is on the side of those who would retain a system of racial spoils and perpetual victim status.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.