Commentary Magazine


Contentions

At the President’s Suggestion — and Now, at His Command

Congressional Quarterly reported yesterday on the then-pending cloture vote on the nomination of Harold Koh to be Legal Adviser to the State Department, and on the anxiety that Republicans have expressed about his legal transnationalism, which seeks to “bring international law home” by subsuming it into the U.S. legal system without Congressional action. Koh, realizing that being tagged with that would hurt his nomination, was at pains to deny that this is what he wants, and CQ notes his denial – with a quotation directly from Koh that makes the case for the opposition:

They are only binding in our court, international and foreign law, when judges make them so, the president suggests that they should be so, or Congress embodies them into an act of Congress that’s signed by the president . . . . International and foreign law don’t become our law unless they are brought into our law by an act of American legal institutions.

I have been reading Koh’s writings for months.  At times, it’s Alice in Wonderland, six impossible things before breakfast stuff.  But this one made my jaw drop.  Forget about the argument that judges have the power to make international and foreign law binding in U.S. courts, even though that’s legal transnationalism in a nutshell.  What really shocked me is Koh’s contention that international and foreign law are binding when “the president suggests that they should be so.”  So not only is the president an “American legal institution,” he also has the power to bind U.S. courts to follow foreign law with a simple suggestion.

True, Koh’s said this kind of thing before.  In 2002, he described “informal state-to-state gatherings” as a “legal process” that constituted “a law-declaring forum that can operate at the global level” and “declare an international norm.”  A few months ago, on the Heritage Foundation’s blog, I pointed out that this “implies that the informal, international word of the President or his representatives is law, and therefore incumbent upon the State Department’s Legal Adviser to enforce.  This is a radical claim.”

But even I didn’t think that Koh would put it quite as plainly as he did in the CQ piece.  As long as Koh likes what he says – because he certainly didn’t extend that kind of deference to George W. Bush – Koh believes the President’s word is law.  With thousands of pages of legal writing behind him, it was always going to be tricky for Koh to escape from his record.  But quotations like this one make me wonder why he even bothered to try, or how anyone can claim with a straight face that his repeatedly-expressed beliefs are not, in fact, his.  Perhaps the answer is simple: it works.  Koh won his cloture vote today, by a pretty comfortable 65-31 margin.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.