Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Well, Aside From It Being Futile and Deceitful. . .

David Ignatius explains that the Obama administration’s fixation with Israeli settlements is fully embraced by Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and Rahm Emanuel, all of whom show little sympathy for the obvious inability of the Israeli government to control natural growth within its settlements. But even if one did not object to the U.S. reneging on past agreements or to its “dictating” to a supposedly close friend, there is a hitch. Ignatius explains:

The Obama team is assuming that if it can pressure Israel into a real settlements freeze, the Arabs will respond with meaningful moves toward normalization of relations — which will give Israel some tangible benefits for its concessions. But that hope appears to be misplaced.

Oh, so the whole thing is wildly realistic and destined to fail? Well, yes. Like the Soviets of old who airbrushed out inconvenient reminders of bygone eras, the president can entirely excise out sixty years of Palestinian rejectionism from his Cairo speech. But he can’t change reality. Even if Netunyahu set up an “apartment police” and every East Jerusalem add-on apartment were torn up and every settlement removed,  there still would be no viable interlocutor to negotiate with Israel and no expressed desire by the Palestinians to recognize a Jewish state. So what then is the point of beating up on our ally?

You’ve got me. It is the triumph of ideology over reality. And it is evidence as to just how deceitful was Obama’s campaign rhetoric with regard to Israel and the Middle East. We know what he said then. It bears no resemblance to the current approach. Had he revealed his hand during the campaign certainly then-candidate Clinton, who professed to be a great friend of Israel, would have seized on the issue.

But now they are together, joined at the hip in their hostility and their futile effort to bludgeon Israel in the hopes it will bring about peace. While they are contemplating what happened to their grand plans for engagement with Iran they might also want to rethink this approach to Israel. And those who believed Obama’s professed understanding and empathy for the plight of Israel can decide if it is time to stop making excuses and begin to openly criticize and oppose the administration’s wholly misguided policies.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.