Commentary Magazine


Contentions

The New York Times’ “Putsch”

In today’s New York Times Book Review, Geoffrey Wheatcroft reviews Richard N. Haass’s “War of Necessity, War of Choice.” As usual when a book about George W. Bush is involved, the review is actually more of an op-ed.

Wheatcroft’s effort is marred by his shaky grasp of the American Constitution. Here is his description of some “valuable insider’s insights” he found in the book:

[Haass] details the sheer contempt the Bushies showed toward the State Department (and Colin Powell), the great expansion of vice presidential power, and the way Donald Rumsfeld effectively silenced the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  Leaving aside Iraq itself, this series of events really added up to an extraordinary episode in American history, a kind of internal Washington putsch against the Constitution.

Under the Constitution, civilian authority controls the military, which is why the Secretary of Defense can decide (as Rumsfeld did) to deal directly with his field commanders rather than give the Joint Chiefs an independent voice. Assigning the Vice President important duties (such as inventing the Internet) was once considered admirable, not grounds for constitutional concern. And presidents as diverse as Harry Truman and Richard Nixon found that reverence for the views of the State Department was not always wise, much less constitutionally required.

Haass himself does not allege a kind of coup in his book.  He writes instead that, because of Powell’s inadequate advocacy skills, his failure to develop a better relationship with Bush, and the relative weakness of many of the senior State Department officials, the result was that “at the end of the day it was more often than not still the positions of those at the Defense Department, the Vice President’s office, and the NSC that mostly shaped U.S. policy” during Bush’s first term.  Some putsch.

Even a high school journalism teacher might have questioned Wheatcroft’s concept of a “putsch,” but not the editors of the New York Times Book Review, not for this kind of “review.”



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.