Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Premature Panic in Afghanistan?

That was a startling headline in the Wall Street Journal yesterday:

Taliban Now Winning: U.S. Commander in Afghanistan Warns of Rising Casualties

But I was suspicious the minute I read the first paragraph:

The Taliban have gained the upper hand in Afghanistan, the top American commander there said, forcing the U.S. to change its strategy in the eight-year-old conflict by increasing the number of troops in heavily populated areas like the volatile southern city of Kandahar, the insurgency’s spiritual home.

Note the lack of quote marks around any statement in the lead or in the headline. If General Stan McChrystal had actually said “the Taliban are winning,” why did the Journal rely on a paraphrase? Turns out because he didn’t actually say it.

According to various military spokesmen, the Journal version of McChyrstal’s remarks was “inaccurate”:

To clarify, the commander did not say the Taliban was winning, in his interview with the Wall Street Journal as suggested by the headline. He explained that International Security Assistance Forces are facing an aggressive enemy, employing complex tactics that is gaining momentum in some parts of Afghanistan. During the course of the interview he also observed that insurgents in Afghanistan face their own problems in terms of popularity, cohesiveness and ability to sustain morale and fighting capacity.

That seems a more likely description of what McChrystal actually said—and a better description of what is actually happening on the ground. It would be fair to say that the Taliban have been winning in southern Afghanistan, while eastern Afghanistan has been stalemated, and the Taliban have been starting to carry out attacks in the north and west. But that’s not to say the Taliban are winning in the whole country, as suggested by the headline. The overall level of violence is still far below what it was in Iraq at the height of its insurgency, and Kabul remains more secure than Baghdad ever was—or is today. Moreover, Taliban gains in the south and east are likely to be rolled back, at least to some extent, with the arrival of new U.S. troops, which will bring our troop total to 68,000. So, yes, we should be deeply concerned about Afghanistan—the situation certainly warrants greater American resources, including more troops. But there’s no need to push the panic button.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.