Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Change Again?

Daniel Henninger notes that there is a worldwide “throw the bums out” trend. In Japan, the UK, and here in the U.S., it isn’t a good time to be an incumbent. As for the U.S., he observes:

In the U.S., political handicappers are predicting heavy Democratic losses in the House next November. This just four years after ending GOP control of Congress in the 2006 elections and two years after sweeping into office Barack Obama and his Democratic partners.

Congress’s approval rating remains stuck around 30%. This number may be more important as an indicator of public sentiment toward the nation’s leadership than presidential approval.

Some search for an ideological trend toward the left or right in these votes, but the only evident trend is to strike out at whichever blob is currently in power. Even as Americans turned over their country to liberal Democrats, opinion polls showed that the British people were turning toward the Conservatives for relief from listless Labour.

His take is that this is a revolt against indebtedness, caused by the orgy of spending and the silent creep of entitlements and accompanied by a squeeze in payroll taxes. Ordinary voters are left with the sense that no one is really responsible for the whole mess. So, he explains, “national electorates are attempting accountability by voting whole parties out of power.”

The irony is great, of course. The “hope and change” Obama has joined the status quo of debt-mongers while a worldwide grassroots movement, populist and suspicious of the big-government solutions that Obama and his European fan club tout, may sweep this crowd out before they’ve unpacked. It turns out that “change” meant something else to the electorate, at least in the U.S., than what it did to Obama. He set out to change the relationship between the private and public sectors, between citizens and their government. The public just wants government to be accountable and cease gobbling up a greater and greater share of the nation’s wealth.

If Obama doesn’t understand and address the sort of change American voters want, he and his party will also be swept out in the tide of public anger. Getting a peek at that anger this summer must have been a sobering sight — if he could spot it all the way from Martha’s Vineyard. And if he missed the sneak preview, the 2010 elections will be harder to ignore.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.