Commentary Magazine


Contentions

So Little, So Late

David Ignatius wants to know why Obama’s response to the disclosure of the secret Iranian facility is so, well, wimpy. He asks, “So why didn’t the Obama administration lay down an even stronger marker in response to this breakout–by threatening, say, to intercept ships at sea that it believed were carrying parts for the Iranian nuclear program?” The best he can come up with is that the president is trying to maintain “consensus” among other nations who don’t want to do much of anything.

Wait a minute. Obama concealed whatever information he had about this facility–information that could have been used to move domestic and international opinion. He could have gone to the UN with some visual aids–like Bibi Netanyahu did with the Holocaust documents–to make the case to the international community. At the UN he could have dispensed with the filler material on global warming and his insincere praise for open markets and used his opportunity to build consensus so he could then make the case for robust action. To now claim that Obama is a victim of international lethargy is disingenuous in the extreme. Obama has done everything possible to avoid bringing this to the point where he might have to take forceful action. Now he’s been forced there by the Iranians.

And Obama is still spouting double-talk. Sanctions? Well, he’s just exploring a wide range of options. He’s really not into “speculating,” which is what he’s been doing all along since there is no real game plan beyond talking to Iran and seeing how things go. Iranians would be making a “mistake” if they continued on this path. He declares: “I will not get into details about sanctions but if you have the international community making a united front, Iran’s going to have to pay attention.” Or else. Really.

Nowhere do you get the sense that Iran is in any peril because of its behavior in violating existing international agreements and in repeatedly acting to conceal its conduct. The message, if you can find one, is that if America reduces its rhetoric to the lowest common denominator, there will magically be consensus. But consensus is not the goal. Eliminating Iran’s nuclear threat is. Or is it? Obama never really evidences any interest in utilizing military options, if need be, to remove that threat. It has been and continues to be a pathetic display of weakness that must only embolden the Iranian mullahs.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.