Commentary Magazine


Contentions

What Will It Take?

Karl Rove observes:

The narrative Obama White House officials are writing about themselves is that they are uncompromising, ungracious, and ready to run roughshod over popular opinion. They have mastered the Chicago way of politics: reward friends, punish enemies, and jam the opposition. Voters have a tendency to quickly grow tired of pugnacious governance.

There is an irony — or a bait and switch — here that the candidate who ran as the leader of the New Politics, the man to rise above fray and to free himself (and us) from the partisan strife that had polarized the electorate over the past decade or two, is now a hyper-partisan figure. As Rove notes, the hyper-partisanship is married with a far-Left ideological bent — the very combination to turn off independents and allow Republicans to claw back from the ledge of political irrelevance. Yet the administration continues down that same leftist path with a chip on its shoulder. Rove observes:

Maybe the Obama inner sanctum realizes that its agenda is unpopular and will cost many Democrats their seats next year but calculates that enough will survive to keep the party in control of Congress. Perhaps they have decided that Mr. Obama’s goal of turning America into a European-style social democracy is worth risking a voter revolt.

Nevertheless, anxious supporters and nervous Democrats wonder if Obama can or will moderate both his agenda and his style in order to preserve his own standing and his party’s electoral prospects. One supposes that the Obami read the poll numbers, look at the election returns, and listen to the pleas of moderate and conservative Democrats. Logic and political experience might dictate that a course correction is in order. Wouldn’t they want to slow the backlash and stem the wave of opposition?

Well, perhaps not. One senses that this White House is more immune than most to inconvenient data and criticism, constructive and otherwise. They have fallen into the habit of vilifying and marginalizing their opponents, suggesting that the administration discounts their arguments and ignores the bad news. They may simply not believe that the president and his party are losing the affection and trust of the American people.

It may be that only an electoral comeuppance will dent the White House bubble. New Jersey and Virginia may not make an impact, but significant losses in Congress may suggest, finally, that running hard Left and governing like a Chicago pol have their limitations.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.