Susan Estrich writes ostensibly on the brewing controversy over new standards for mammography: “The longer answer is that you practice medicine on an individualized basis. While certain things may be true as a matter of ‘public health’ — like the costs of early mammograms outweighing their benefits — that doesn’t mean they’re true for you.” That, of course, is the best argument there is against ObamaCare and other like-minded government-run health-care schemes.
This didn’t take long: “After four years of grappling with how to appeal to voters, a group of top Republicans believe they’ve found a winning formula for 2010. Call it the McDonnell Strategy. The shorthand: run on economic policy, downplay divisive cultural issues, present an upbeat tone, target independent voters and focus on Democratic-controlled Washington—all without attacking President Barack Obama personally.”
Marty Peretz writes on a potential silver-lining in the civilian trial of KSM: “This is also likely to evoke from the millions and millions of enthusiasts of true jihad demonstrations of fidelity and enthusiasm. That is also a good thing. Otherwise, we will still be stunned every time Muslim terror strikes.” Well, the other option is that when Muslim terror does strike — as in Fort Hood — officials and mainstream media refuse to call it a Muslim terror strike.
Another Democrat refuses to play dumb: “Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., said after a briefing from Pentagon and Army officials that his committee will investigate how those and other e-mails involving the alleged shooter, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, were handled and why the U.S. military was not made aware of them before the Nov. 5 shooting. Levin said his committee is focused on determining whether the Defense Department’s representative on the terrorism task force acted appropriately and effectively. Levin also said he considers Hasan’s shooting spree, which killed 13 and wounded more than 30, an act of terrorism.”
A smart take on Obama’s Asia trip: “The problem with President Obama’s recent swing through Asia cannot be boiled down to the kowtow, the collapse of Copenhagen, or the rebukes in Beijing and Tokyo. Lack of success does not automatically add up to failure. The more damaging outcome of the trip for Obama is the entrenchment of the perception at home and abroad of the president as a pied piper of American retreat in the world.”
Obama tries to play defense: “President Barack Obama on Saturday urged Americans to show patience over the economy and argued that his just-concluded Asia trip was critical for U.S. exports, countering criticism he had returned empty-handed.”
James Pinkerton on health-care reform: “So what we have seen, and what we will continue to see, is the gradual peeling back of all the rationing and rationing-esque ‘reforms’ dreamed up by the national policy elites. Those elites are plenty smart, but the grad-school group is committed to an intellectual model that the American people reject. Think of it as the health-care equivalent of cap-and-trade–that is, a too-clever-by-half scheme that works well on a Cambridge chalkboard, and nowhere else.”
Her story and sticking to it: “Sen. Blanche Lincoln is a yes for debating health reform, but a no for the public option, and she and fellow centrists are making clear they expect Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to scrap his current plan for a government-run insurance program.” But if a government-run health-care reform passes, which Lincoln’s constituents hates, she’ll have a tough time convincing them that she wasn’t responsible. After all, she could have stopped it in its tracks.
Voters can register their objections in the 2010 senate race: “Just 35% of New York State voters agree with Attorney General Eric Holder’s decision to try the confessed mastermind of the 9/11 terror attacks and five other suspected terrorists in a civilian court in New York City rather than before a military tribunal. A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in the state finds that 55% are opposed to that decision, which is part of the Obama administration’s effort to close the terrorist prison camp at the Guantanamo Naval Base in Cuba.”










“John F. Kennedy has been enveloped in a halo since his assassination”
That is only the beginning of the problem. A myth was created claiming that JFK was murdered by a ultra-right wing fanatic and not a committed Communist. This nonsense helped George McGovern and his ilk to capture the Democratic Party in less than a decade after his death. James Piereson is right to point out that Lee Harvey Oswald turned out be among the most successful assassins in world history. Due to the silliness of lefties like Jacqueline Kennedy, Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., and Martin Luther King, Jr., Oswald essentially accomplished all of his goals. America’s opposition to Communism was severely weakened.
Given Obama’s near-complete lack of experience, I continue to be flabbergasted that Americans can take Obama seriously as a presidential candidate. He is the least qualified, serious candidate we’ve had since the Democrats ran Williams Jennings Bryan in 1896.
I well remember the Kennedy campaign, the magic world of Camelot, etc. and as a historian am painfully aware of what a sham it was. Obama is clearly a man of higher quality than either of the Clintons, but I agree that he is not ready for the presidency (Nor is Hillary, nor was Bill, but for deeper reasons than simple lack of experience).
What I want to know from all the Contentions pundits is this: How much of a difference with the Kennedy endorsement mak?. My sense is that it is very important. One of my colleagues today mentioned how Teddy was showing the Clintons “what a real Kennedy was.” If he campaigns hard, that can only be devastating to Hillary and Bill and a huge plus for Obama.
I suspect the reason for the strong endorsement may be that even Teddy realizes that four or eight years of another Clinton will destroy the Democratic party, by making it an utterly corrupt extension of the Arkansas swamp, and utterly unprincipled and without serious convictions or ideas–like the Clintons themselves.
Whether Obama could win the election remains to be seen. But it may be that even if he loses, he will save the Democrats from a worse fate.