Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Not Reassuring

Well this, from the New York Times, is not very encouraging:

In declaring Tuesday that he would “finish the job” in Afghanistan, President Obama used a phrase clearly meant to imply that even as he deploys an additional 30,000 or so troops, he has finally figured out how to bring the eight-year-long conflict to an end. But offering that reassuring if somewhat contradictory signal — that by adding troops he can speed the United States toward an exit — is just the first of a set of tricky messages Mr. Obama will have to deliver as he rolls out his strategy publicly.

It seems that tricky messaging is the last thing we (both the country and Obama) need right now. The protracted dithering has unnerved our allies and emboldened our foes, suggesting that the president’s heart isn’t in this and that he is desperately looking to find an out. Now he’s going to reinforce that by publicly hedging his bets? Well, that’s the sort of suggestion that seems to have come from the political-consultant crowd that didn’t want to adopt Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s plan in the first place.

And forgetting the national-security implications for a moment, this seems to portend a political disaster:

Over the next week, he will deliver multiple messages to multiple audiences: voters at home, allies, the leaders of Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the extremists who are the enemy. And as Mr. Obama’s own aides concede, the messages directed at some may undercut the messages sent to others.

Yikes. So in the end everyone will be unnerved, by both the image of the president as lacking resolution and the disturbing impression that everything in this administration is about politics and spin. It took them months to come up with this? We are told the game plan here (with some wiggle room in how troop levels are counted) will, wow, give the president “flexibility” and allow him “to tell the Democrats that his commitment is limited, and to tell the Republicans that he will do whatever it takes to win what, only three months ago, he called a ‘war of necessity.’” Hearing that, you realize just how polluted with politics has become the formulation of war strategy. In the end, I suspect, the competing sides in the domestic debate, as well as our enemies, will figure out that Obama is trying to have it all ways and thereby lacks the singular determination to win a difficult war.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.