You have to hand it to the mainstream media. They are nothing if not consistent and dogged in their efforts to push the “Republicans are at each other’s throats” meme — at the very moment that Democrats are rushing for the retirement home and attacking one another over the pro-insurance-company health-care “reform” bill. Dan Balz of the Washington Post is a case in point. He writes this odd account under the subheading “The GOP’s Internal War”:
Were it not for the news of the Democratic retirements, Tuesday might have received more attention as a day when the GOP’s internal wars counted another victim, this time the party chairman in Florida, Jim Greer. Greer, an ally of Florida Gov. Charlie Crist (R), got caught up in the nasty Senate primary contest between Crist and former state House speaker Marco Rubio, a darling of conservatives.
Florida’s GOP primary is, writ large, a replay of what happened in New York’s 23rd Congressional District in November, when Sarah Palin and other conservatives spurned the Republican nominee in a House special election and sided with the Conservative Party candidate. The upshot was that Democrats won a seat that the GOP had held for more than a century.
This is nonsense on multiple counts. First, the “internal war” appears to consist of the removal of an unpopular state party chairman and a primary race in one state. Is the Democratic party in an “internal war” because there’s a primary to fill Obama’s old seat or because Arlen Specter and Joe Sestak are facing off in Pennsylvania? Really, primaries are pretty much par for the course, the mechanism by which real voters pick strong candidates and eliminate weak ones. Second, none of this has much to do with the NY-23. There the GOP didn’t have a primary. And it turned into a giant mess with a weak, unpopular candidate who ultimately had to drop out.
For now, the GOP is enjoying an embarrassment of political riches — an energized base, plenty of candidates, and plenty of targets (e.g., ObamaCare, Nancy Pelosi, the Cash for Cloture deal). If all the Democrats have is a false narrative spun by their media cheerleaders, it may be a very bad year for them indeed.
The two-state solution under present and foreseeable circumstances is a recipe for war. I oppose it. And Bush’s endorsement of it counts against him for me.
Still, an endorsement is just an endorsement. Bush also endorsed Olmert. Insh’allah, he can visit Olmert when the latter is out on probation.
I meant parole. Apologies.
I’m absolutely, irrevocably opposed to a two-state solution [more like the beginnings of a "final solution" from the way Israel's neighbours behave, and if their professed wishes were ever to be realised]
And if I may disagree, for once with Mr Greenwald, I suspect that he may be buying in a little too much, and a little too quickly, into the mantra of Kadima and the Israeli Left, that
[all of ] “Israel has been indefatigable in its committment to a two-state solution”
Do you guys, you really very smart guys, actually believe this stuff, just because Olmert, Livni and Yossi Beilen, all of them,hopefully on their way out, and soon, keep saying it’s so?
And, if I may, one more small thing.
While I am one of those folks, very strongly opposed to a “two-state solution”, I do not, Mr Greenwald, at all “object to” or disparage in any possible way, President Bush’s pledge to “stand by Israel”, since I see no necessary contradiction nor mutual exclusion in the enunciation of both positions.