Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Breaking Up Isn’t Really Hard to Do

Ed Kilgore delivers the news that liberals and libertarians have broken up. This reminds one of an ill-fated romance in which none of the friends of either half of the couple could figure out what the pair was doing together. Kilgore seems reluctant to admit that libertarians, who fancy self-reliance, limited government, and free markets, are coming to their senses now that they see that the Obami and the Democratic Congress believe in none of these things. He seems to imagine it is all the tea party protesters’ fault. (“This phenomenon has pulled libertarianism rightward: Despite some expressed concerns about the crudeness and cultural conservatism of many Tea Party activists, it has become clear that most self-conscious libertarians are willing to participate in, and cheerlead for, the Tea Party movement as though their political futures depend on it.”) He then loses it entirely in a blast of venom at the tea partiers (“After all, it is only a few steps from the Tea Party movement’s founding ‘rant’ — in which self-described Randian business commentator Rick Santelli blasted ‘losers’ who couldn’t pay their mortgages — to populist backlash against all transfer payments of any type, complaints about people ‘voting for a living’ instead of ‘working for a living,’ and paranoid conspiracy theories about groups like ACORN.”) Enough said.

Kilgore imagines that libertarians are defined by secularism or urban coolness. But perhaps libertarians actually believe in all that stuff about freedom. Maybe they, like many other voters (e.g., pro-Israel hawks, fiscal moderates), were taken in by Obama’s rhetoric and failed to perceive that he and his ilk were simply a slickly-packaged version of statist liberals, devoted to growing the public sector, contemptuous of average Americans and ignorant of the workings of market capitalism.

So maybe it was not the rise of nefarious tea party protests that undid the libertarian-liberal relationship, but rather a realization by libertarians that the Democratic Left really offers very little to them. True, libertarians do not embrace social conservatism nor do many favor a robust national-security policy. But libertarians above all are devoted to freedom and faith in the individuals’ ability to control their own lives. And that is simply not going to mesh with the dogma of liberals, who aren’t interested in either. Love may be blind, but libertarians are not.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.