Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Obama’s Medicare Tax “Fairness”

At the secret White House conference committee last month to put the finishing touches on ObamaCare, just days before Scott Brown was elected, one of the proposals reportedly being considered was “boosting the Medicare payroll tax — either by increasing the rate or extending it to unearned income.” The ObamaCare proposal released yesterday by the White House does both.

The proposal would increase the tax rate by 30 percent, from 2.9 percent to 3.8 percent, for “high-income households” (defined as those making $250,000 or more, or individuals making $200,000), and extend the tax to their investment income, while not taxing the investment income of others.

The stated rationale is “fairness” — which has become the all-purpose Obama justification for increased taxes. He used it for his disingenuous proposal to raise tax rates to 39.6 percent while limiting deductions to 28 percent; before that he argued fairness requires that capital-gains taxes be increased even while admitting experience shows lower rates produce more revenue overall.

Obama’s Medicare tax proposal is a particularly egregious form of false advertising, because the Medicare tax is not really a tax relating to Medicare. It no longer relates to the Medicare benefits of those who pay it, and the expanded and increased tax would be used not for Medicare but rather to finance legislation that will dramatically reduce Medicare benefits while funding a new entitlement for others.

The tax proposal would require extensive hearings to properly evaluate its revenue and policy aspects. It contemplates a huge transfer of funds from the private sector to the federal government to be spent or redistributed for purposes other than Medicare. It would complete the transformation of the Medicare tax into an add-on income tax that, together with the existing income rates and the even higher ones Obama plans by letting the current rates “expire” at the end of this year, will push the combined state and federal tax up to 50 percent or more.

But the proposal will not be subjected to the scrutiny of a hearing. It will serve instead as a prop for Obama’s televised political theater on Thursday, when he will come out in favor of “fairness.”


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.