Contentions
-
Articles
-
The Big Lie Returns
Ben Cohen -
Iran's Gambit in Latin America
Roger F. NoriegaWashington has been dangerously slow to counter the Islamic Republic's provocations close to home.
-
The Payroll-Tax Holiday from Hell
Ira StollRepublican confusion and the creation of a political debacle.
-
The Ultra-Orthodox on the Warpath
Mati WagnerAnxiety is driving religious conflict between secular Israelis and haredim.
-
The Worldwide Attack on Christians
David AikmanFrom Egypt to North Korea, an unlikely minority suffers a plague of persecution.
-
Press Man: Why They Wept for Hitchens
Andrew Ferguson
Politics & Ideas
-
Condi's Lessons
Rick RichmanA review of Condoleezza Rice's "No Higher Honor: A Memoir of My Years in Washington"
-
Spun Silk
Arthur Waldron -
A Portrait of Success
Sol Stern -
The War Decade
Michael Rosen -
Blame Canada
Max Boot
Culture & Civilization
-
Charles Dickens and His Women
Thomas L. Jeffers -
The Producer
Terry Teachout -
Eco's Protocols
D.G. Myers
John Podhoretz
-
Decline Has Been Chosen
John Podhoretz
Threat Assessment
-
Hamas's Unchanged Heart
Jonathan S. Tobin
Letters
-
Setting Nazis Free
Our ReadersLetters in response to Kevin J. Madigan's “How the Catholic Church Sheltered Nazi War Criminals”
-
Giving Reagan His Due
Our ReadersLetters in response to Steven Hayward's “The Liberal Misappropriation of a Conservative President”
-
Educating the Revolutionaries
Our ReadersLetters in response to Joshua Muravchik's “Neoconservatives and the Arab Spring”
-
Nice Conductors Finish Last?
Our Readers -
Radio Jonestown
Our ReadersLetters in response to George Russell's "The Left's Great Crime"
Enter Laughing
-




Article of the Week…
…is by COMMENTARY’s own Andrew Ferguson, in the new Weekly Standard. Entitled “The Roots of Lunacy,” this superb piece of political analysis and cultural takedown considers the way in which political hatred morphs over time, with particular emphasis on Dinesh D’Souza’s new bestseller, The Roots of Obama’s Rage. Andy’s point in the end is that looking for explanations for the origins of Obama’s politics is a ridiculous exercise since he is simply an “unchecked liberal” who is likely more moderate than a President Kerry or a President Edwards would have been. I don’t think that’s right; Obama’s unchecked liberalism is of an order different from the liberalism of anyone who might have served in his stead owing to the fact that it really is unchecked by any experience in political or ideological compromise of any sort. Edwards was a Democratic pol in a Southern state and had some sense at least of how to talk to people who don’t agree with him; Kerry served in the Senate for a very long time under Democratic and Republican majorities and at least had learned how to maneuver in a heterodox partisan atmosphere. None of that is true of Obama, whose inexperience both helped get him elected and now gives him absolutely no sense of how to handle the turnaround in the national mood or the disenchantment of the voters with him. Ideologically, he gives one the sense that the only conservative he’s ever talked to is David Brooks, and he views the plurality of the electorate that uses the word “conservative” to describe itself as a strange, distasteful foreign creature whose president he also, unfortunately, must be.