Here’s the “civil war” the liberal punditocracy has been pining for: “Liberals want Obama to confront Republicans more directly. Moderates, remembering how Bill Clinton altered course after losing control of Congress in 1994 and won reelection in 1996, want the president to work more cooperatively with Republicans in hopes of avoiding gridlock.”
Here’s another national security disaster in the making: “The Obama administration has dispatched a team of experts to Asian capitals to report that North Korea appears to have started a program to enrich uranium, possibly to manufacture more nuclear weapons, a senior U.S. administration official said Saturday. The team was sent out after North Korea told two visiting American experts earlier this month that it possessed such a program and showed them a facility where it claimed the enrichment was taking place.” It sort of puts in context how daft were those meetings and planning for a “nuke-free world.”
Here’s the beginning of the walk-back: “Heeding a sudden furor, John Pistole, administrator of the Transportation Security Administration, said in a Sunday afternoon statement to POLITICO that airport screening procedures ‘will be adapted as conditions warrant,’ in an effort to make them “as minimally invasive as possible, while still providing the security that the American people want and deserve.”
Here’s why voters hate pols: there is always one rule for politicians and another for the rest of us. “Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday that security threats were a concern in the Transportation Security Administration’s new invasive pat-downs and body scans, but heartily acknowledged that she wouldn’t want to go through the screening herself.”
Here’s Mona Charen’s case for why Sarah Palin shouldn’t run for president: “Voters chose a novice with plenty of starpower in 2008 and will be inclined to swing strongly in the other direction in 2012. Americans will be looking for sober competence, managerial skill, and maturity — not sizzle and flash. … There is no denying that Sarah Palin has been harshly, sometimes even brutally, treated by the press and the entertainment gaggle. But any prominent Republican must expect and be able to transcend that. Palin compares herself to Reagan. But Reagan didn’t mud-wrestle with the press. Palin seems consumed and obsessed by it, as her rapid Twitter finger attests, and thus she encourages the sniping.” I imagine that such advice is simply brushed off as part of the GOP establishment plot to get her.
Here’s further evidence that the Obami just don’t get it. Hillary Clinton isn’t giving up on civilian trials for terrorists. “So I don’t think you can, as a — as a rule, say, ‘Oh, no more civilian trials,’ or ‘no more military commission.’” Sure you can; it’s just that the leftists who dominate the Obama legal brain trust are putting up quite a fuss.
Here’s another sign that Obama’s ditzy peace-process Hail Mary isn’t going to help matters: “The Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, said on Sunday that any American proposal for restarting Israeli-Palestinian negotiations must include a complete halt in Israeli settlement building, including in East Jerusalem.” Gosh, where do you think he got the idea that building in Jerusalem was such a hot-button, non-final-status issue?
Relax John. Ignore everything till midnight. Then start panicking.
I feel victorious. My 3 year old grandaughter voted for McCain in nursery school. She probably was the only one like her mother was when she voted for Reagan in elementary school. Personal victory.
JP, history tells us that moderate, me-too Republicanism is a loser. John McCain is now going to be a big loser. It is the conservative first priciples of Gingrich, Reagan and Limbaugh that are the winners. Frum, Brooks and Douthat will try and tell us that it is the new conservatism of the policy wonks that will win for us. But if this is true it must be new policies oriented toward today’s problems but grounded in the first principles of the Reagan, Gingrich, Limbaugh brand of conservative principles – limited government, market economics, originalism, equality of opportunity, natural law and an unapologetic, nationalist foreign policy.
Goddammit.
GOddamit. Goddamit, goddamit.
I fear for us, as a nation. I thought I was prepared for this, but I’m cryin’ like a baby.
David Bethune – Agreed. In the post-election shake-out, can we at least require those who identify themselves as conservative commentators to identify issues on which they are actually conservative? This is especially true for David Brooks. “National Greatness” does not qualify.
George Bush leaves the Republican Party in ruins. His inability to talk created the impression of deep stupidity, he believed in big government and more spending, he picked the wrong generals and civilian overseers for Iraq, he lacked the ability or desire to mix it up with the Democratic leadership, he valued loyalty over ability and surrounded himself with mediocrities . . . well, one could go on all night.
The margins are pretty close. Just too many factors, especially the economy. The Democrats are not going to get sixty in the Senate. Obama is going to have to govern on a razor thin margin of error. Hope he’s up to it.
Trouble is, the Democrats are going to immediately start consolidating their power, and doing everything they can to rig the system so that no other Republican will win again… ever. By 2012, ACORN will be *running* the elections.
Never get too far up or down with elections. The writing was on the wall when the economy went south. Very hard to overcome. But the pendulum swings.
I take that last message back now that I see Reid and Pelosi on the screen. Time to declare war on America.
Unfortunately, the pendulum doesn’t swing anymore after the rope is cut.
Even Tammany Hall came crashing down eventually. Time to be the loyal opposition. Then again, maybe we should play be the Democrats’ handbook and demonize Obama for the next four years. It is tempting.