Commentary Magazine


Contentions

New Israeli Faction Launches a Revolution

Internal party politics aren’t normally the stuff of groundbreaking revolutions. But the Israeli Labor Party’s split this morning could prove to be exactly that.

Like most such splits, this one stemmed partly from personal animosities. But it also had a substantive reason: as one member of the breakaway faction explained, the government will now be able to conduct peace talks “without a stopwatch,” instead of under constant threat that a key coalition faction would quit if Israel didn’t capitulate to Palestinian demands.

For weeks, various Labor ministers have threatened that the party would leave the government if Israeli-Palestinian talks didn’t resume soon. At yesterday’s cabinet meeting, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lashed out at these threats, saying they merely encouraged the Palestinians to up their demands and refuse to negotiate unless they are met.

This isn’t the only reason for Palestinian intransigence, but it’s certainly a contributory factor. Why should the Palestinians negotiate when they can let Israel’s Labor Party do the work for them? And that’s basically what Labor has been doing: demanding that Netanyahu offer ever more concessions to tempt the Palestinians back to the table, on pain of having his government collapse if he refuses. Most Labor MKs never blamed the Palestinians for the impasse or demanded any concessions of them; they put the onus entirely on Netanyahu.

The same is true of Israel’s main opposition party, Kadima. It, too, blamed the impasse entirely on the government, giving the Palestinians a pass, and demanded more concessions only of Israel, not the Palestinians.

This behavior didn’t just increase Palestinian intransigence; it also increased international pressure on and opprobrium for Israel. After all, if even members of Israel’s government deemed Israel the guilty party, why should non-Israelis doubt it?

But finally, a contingent of Israel’s left has said “enough”: As Israelis, it’s our job to negotiate the best deal for Israel, not the Palestinians. And it’s our job to promote Israel’s positions overseas, not to besmirch our own country by promoting the Palestinian narrative.

Right now, it’s a small contingent — five of Labor’s 13 MKs — spearheaded by a widely disliked leader, Defense Minister Ehud Barak. Thus its capacity for growth is unclear. But it does give the government stability, as these five are enough to ensure its majority (especially since many of the others never voted with it anyway). So at least the government is now better positioned to fight the diplomatic battles ahead.

More important, however, five MKs from the heart of the left have openly challenged the leftist parties’ destructive behavior. And if their challenge catches on, it could revolutionize Israel’s diplomatic position. For while many of the reasons for Israel’s growing pariah status have nothing to do with Israel, the chorus of Israelis blaming the ongoing conflict entirely on Israel clearly plays a role. If additional swathes of the left started advocating for their own country rather than its adversaries, Israel could fight back much more effectively.

There are plenty of reasons to dislike Barak and his allies. But in this effort, they deserve support from everyone who cares about Israel.

Introducing Commentary Complete

2 Responses to “New Israeli Faction Launches a Revolution”

  1. Dave says:

    Is it sexist to say I hate feminists?

  2. section9 says:

    Not really. However, most women like to think of themselves as “feminists”, so watch what you say. I mean, in their own unique ways, Maggie Thatcher, Condi Rice, and Sarah Palin were feminists.

    You wouldn’t want the Baroness do to the Handbag Thing to the side of your head, would you?

  3. Harb says:

    Really, Jamie, is your entire career going to consist of this sort of concern-trolling?

  4. Dave says:

    #2, and THOSE are the real feminists. But I wouldn’t dare insult them by calling them such a slur :-)

  5. memomachine says:

    Hmmm.

    Makes me want to post a picture of myself groping Hillary.

    A whole movement might take off based on random strangers publicly groping cardboard images of Hillary.

    At some point the feminist would notice I suppose.

  6. Dan Simon says:

    The “Feministing” blogger really isn’t in any position to complain about a bit of flippant breast-related mugging, given the notoriety of this picture of her and the subsequent blogstorm it triggered.

  7. Forbes says:

    Maybe the feminists are jealous that Favreau isn’t groping their own cardboard cutout?

  8. Harb says:

    The “Feministing” blogger really isn’t in any position to complain about a bit of flippant breast-related mugging, given the notoriety of this picture of her and the subsequent blogstorm it triggered.

    How does the fact that Ann Althouse was obsessed with Jessica Valenti’s breasts mean that Valenti “isn’t in any position to complain about a bit of flippant breast-related mugging”?

  9. Brian Moore says:

    Thanks for the referral! I just spent a good hour reading it, and I know I’ll be back for more. How ’bout this headline:

    “Female robot is the perfect companion, receptionist, sexual assault victim.”

    I can’t wait for their defense of tube socks!