Commentary Magazine


Contentions

GOProud Speaks Out on CPAC Boycott

Despite the fact that the CPAC boycott has drawn a few big names (the Heritage Foundation and Jim DeMint), the campaign has turned out to be a pretty big bust. On the eve of CPAC, the conference is still expected to draw the usual large crowd of prominent conservatives, and organizers claim that attendance is actually up from last year. So it’s understandable that GOProud — the gay conservative group that boycotters were attempting to ostracize — is taking the opportunity to gloat a bit in the pages of Metro Weekly:

Of the Heritage Foundation’s decision, he says, ”They’ve chosen to – and it’s a mystery to me why – but they’ve chosen to align themselves with the losers.” …

”Look, Heritage does a lot of good work, and I didn’t want — it looks terrible for them, and I didn’t want to have them humiliate themselves. But they’ve seemed hell-bent on it. Their story keeps changing and now we’re down to the truth, which is: It was about us. And they’ve lost donors. They’ve lost supporters.” …

Of those calling for the boycott, Barron says, ”They’re all excited that Jim DeMint is boycotting. And that’s fantastic. I’m glad that he’s willing to be on the Island of Political Misfit Toys with [World Net Daily's Joseph] Farah and the Concerned Women for America.”

Honestly, who can blame them? Obviously GOProud’s won this battle. Social-conservative groups went into the boycott believing that they could turn GOProud’s attendance into a major controversy. And while it may have been a headache for the conference organizers to deal with — especially after DeMint and Heritage dropped out and it looked like the boycott could catch on — the campaign actually had very little impact on the event.

In the end, it’s the boycotters who have to deal with the image problem. If they had taken their concerns to the conference, written op-eds about them, or otherwise engaged in dialogue, they might be in a better position right now. Instead, they look closed-minded, petty, and unwilling to communicate with those they disagree with. The plan could not have backfired more spectacularly.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.