Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Give Defense What It Needs and Cut What It Doesn’t

Rising budget deficits make it imperative to cut federal spending, but why is the Defense Department, of all government departments, at the head of the line? Given that we are still engaged in, depending on how you count, three major wars (Iraq, Afghanistan, War on Terror), this hardly seems like the time to be cutting back on our overstretched armed forces. Yet that is precisely what’s happening. Even Defense Secretary Bob Gates, who has shown a willingness to take a scalpel to his own budget, is now worrying about a possible “crisis” if Congress does not increase the amount available to the Pentagon in a continuing resolution that is being used to fund the government in lieu of a budget. As the New York Times notes:

If that stopgap budget stays in place for the entire fiscal year, it would result in military spending of $526 billion, not counting the costs of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, or a cut of $23 billion from the administration’s request of $549 billion. Mr. Gates demanded that Congress approve 2011 spending of at least $540 billion.

Even if the Pentagon gets everything it needs for this year, it will suffer a cut next year:

For next year, the Pentagon is requesting $670.6 billion for the 2012 fiscal year, which starts Oct. 1. That includes $553 billion for its base budget and $117.8 billion for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

As a result, the total of $693 billion in 2010 might have represented the peak for the surge in military spending that began after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

This is a worrisome prospect because the world remains a dangerous place, and the U.S. armed forces remain committed to a wide variety of missions. This isn’t to say that every dime of Pentagon spending is sacrosanct. But at the same time that the Department of Defense is seeing vital capabilities threatened, it is being forced to spend billions of dollars on boondoggles imposed by Congress — such as a second engine for the F-35, the airborne laser, and an out-of-control Defense Department health-care system.

Congress has to decide whether it is serious about austerity or not. If it is, it will give up on programs deemed overly costly by the Pentagon’s own leaders — while fully funding the essential requirements we need to fight our nation’s wars and maintain a global presence.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.