Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Manning Moving

The Pentagon, which has been criticized for months over its alleged mistreatment of suspected WikiLeaks collaborator Bradley Manning, has decided to move the army private “to another prison under conditions that may be less restrictive,” the New York Times reported yesterday.

Manning will be moved to Fort Leavenworth in Kansas, which houses the only maximum-security disciplinary barracks in the country. While the Pentagon has said that Manning’s current detention center, Quantico, was equipped to handle the maximum-security prisoner, there were allegations that the army private was treated in an unusually strict manner.

There are several reasons why this may be happening right now. Activists have increased their criticism of Manning’s detention recently (despite the fact that there’s little evidence of mistreatment). A UN torture investigator attempted to visit Manning last week, and was allegedly denied access to him. Charges that the Obama administration is allowing the torture of prisoners is obviously a major concern for the White House, especially after Obama’s criticism of the Bush interrogation techniques.

According to the Village Voice, Manning’s attorney was in the process of filing a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that the army private’s due process was violated by Quantico.

Manning’s mental health also contributed to the decision, according to Defense Department’s General Council Jeh Johnson. The prisoner was kept in confinement for long stretches at Quantico, but at the maximum-security Fort Leavenworth he’ll be allowed to interact with other prisoners and be able to spend more time outside his cell.

Unsurprisingly, the development doesn’t seem to have appeased anti-war activists, who don’t want Manning in prison in the first place.

“Any move of Pfc. Manning does not change the underlying fact, which has not been disputed by the Department of Defense, that he has been held under conditions which may in fact constitute ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ in violation of the 8th amendment,” said Rep. Dennis Kucinich in a statement yesterday. Kucinich also demanded a one-on-one meeting with the suspected traitor.


Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.